Now I know
I was admonished over and over. For months. By "People." Many..."People." Now, mind you: everyone lies. Really. But I've always been the sort to dismiss so-called "white lies," and hyperbole. Moreover, I sit as my own judge in determining for myself whether any particular lie rises to my own standard of outrage—because everyone should have their own standard of outrage.
Let's take progress pics, mine included: tan, suck in the gut a bit—not too much—suitable clothing, decent photography, etc.
Like this?

Dr. Jack Kruse, Nov. 2009?
No, not even close, and anyone with just a small bit of sense would know immediately it's not only not Dr. Kruse, but most likely never will be. But can you prove it? Indeed, you can. So here goes.
I got emailed a link last evening, right here (if you don't click & look, you'll be a bit lost going forward). It's a screen clip of a photo posted at 7:02pm on May 9, 2012, to IPMG (International Paleo Movement Group) by Jack Kruse from his personal FB profile (not the one representing his blog/website). Yes, as my earlier post attests and is totally genuine, that group is awesome. But this is how I found out about it...not getting out, much. So, please don't let this post dissuade you in any way from enjoying the huge value that group is creating day by day.
Like I said, I knew immediately that was not Jack's back. And I could not imagine how someone could be so brash as to try to pass it off as such. Given events recently, the spoof/parody Twitter account, and still extending (expending?) every benefit of doubt I could until my eyes bled out, I noted that Jack's blog/website account is "Dr. Jack Kruse" and this was from "Jack Kruse," and with a different profile pic. Was he being spoofed, again? Well, it didn't take long to discover he has a personal FB as well, and he has a lot of posts on it tagged public, so you know it's him (plus, the who's who of friends he has).
I then joined IPMG, and scrolled for a long time (there are just tons and tons of posts there, every day) to get a single week back to assure myself that yes, Jack did, in fact, post this:

Screen Shot 2012 05 16 at 8 26 47 AM
...And you know what? I have debated with myself, talked to "People" on the phone, etc. ...Over the last six hours, deciding first to give it a rest and deliberate, and so on. ...And then I look at those comments to that post.
And then I look at those comments to that post
And then, I look at those comments to that fucking post....
Every time I do, I feel more and more ashamed for extending the benefit of the doubt, getting in huge arguments with "People"...even telling some "People" to fuck off, including one of the nearest, dearest and best "People" friends I've ever had.
Go look through the hard ass work some of these people are doing at IPMG and posting it, including women in their panties. Their own hard work; and then, imagine that someone just has to 1-up everybody; and even to the point where, because he's a doc & surgeon—and ought righteously to be above reproach—they innocently submit to him.
Evil? You decide.
Jack Kruse, in the end, asked more than I could ever give and I was willing to give a fuck of a lot. I was willing to put up with his over the top hyperbole as just an ethic: people put up with my over the top blogging in terms of being whatever it is people think of me. I'm paying back.
I've had numerous exchanges with him by text and phone. I always thought he was worth the effort.
But I'm done.
Blogging is being yourself. If you're playing a role, you have a website. I've been being myself and blogging about it—with all the stinky included, since 2003—and it 'aint worth Jack, or anyone else. BTW, giving Jack leeway wasn't unprecedented, even amongst the so-called "Paleo elite." Robb Wolf did, but he became impatient too. I doubt Robb would regret that I mention that he and I had a long email exchange over that, and the real gist is, it's a bummer. Jack is really dynamic and hype be dammed. He could help a lot, but this level of lying is just not something I can abide.
Yes, I did the reverse image search on the photo as well, as my final step of due diligence even though I knew precisely what I would find. If you have any further doubts, click here, courtesy of more good "People."
OK, so now I invite every single People or just people to tell me "I told you so." I guess I deserve it. The one thing is, I no longer have to take anyone's word for it and that's an important thing for me. Yea, I suppose I could have dug, so it's not a huge point.
Onward.
Addendum (5/17/2012): Having looked at at all the comments so far and the other action here and there and around, seeing pretty much what I expected, I figured it was perhaps time to add a bit to the post about the first couple of times Jack made me doubt his sincerity. I brushed those two things off as "strikes 1 & 2," but it's not as though, as some of Jack's defenders attest, that I just went off half-cocked here.
First of all, I talked to Jack by phone—basically a mini-interview—in advance of my first post about him and the controversy involving Leptin Reset and Cold Thermogenesis. I thought both protocols had merit and wanted to spread the word. I'd already seen his Tedx Talk and how he described having had surgery without general anesthesia, went home, had his wife and daughter pack him in ice, etc., etc. As I asked him about all of this over the phone he added that it was that night, January 9th, that I had spoken with him on the phone.
Ever been in a conversation with someone and out of politeness, don't call them on an inconsistency? Perhaps he's mistaken. I didn't actually know which specific evening I'd spoken with him and it's 3 months later. So, maybe he's mistaken about the day. Give it a pass.
Now in retrospect, perhaps it was very important because, you see, for three months I had in mind that when I called, Jack was doing a major CT self experiment. I forget how many hours he said he was going to do, but:
- He said not one word about having surgery.
- He said not one word about injecting himself with bacteria.
When I asked why he was doing this, he said, "chronic back pain." He also said that his family had no idea he was doing this, that he had taken time off work to do it, had someone watching over him, and that he was eating during the experiment. So, the Tedx talk 3 months later is the first time I hear about the bacteria, surgery, and that his family was involved in the ice packing. Still, I didn't not connect that with my previous conversation with him because there was essentially nothing about the stories that were the same. So when he claimed our conversation was that same night I should probably have not given it a pass, but I did.
Next, during that same phone conversation in advance of my first post, he told me about his "Factor X" and I believe my response was along the lines of 'huh, interesting.' Later, in his podcast interview Abel James, that somehow gets translated into "Richard was totally blown away!" I think he even said it twice. Perhaps it would have been nitpick of me to bring it up then, but not so much now.
Anyway, Jack initially had quite a lot of defenders in this comment thread coming in to complain, then explain how Jack's Facebook account got hacked, etc. They appear to have been silenced, as it has been pointed out that while Jack says he was not on FB at all on May 9th (and was "hacked"), there's 10 other posts from him on his personal FB page that people have screen clips of (in case they've been deleted to cover tracks), and there's posts on his fan page as well, as well as interaction with commenters. In short, there's a whole lot of reasons this simply was not a hack, and essentially no reasons—without trying to explain how the planets orbit the earth—that it was.
And there's a whole lot more.
Finally, as I've said to others in comments, I understand that everyone arrives at their own conclusions in their own time, and based on differing amounts of information. And that's totally fine. I'm just saying that what I've found and have posted about is now plenty for me.























