Prof. Art Ayers On Autoimmunity; Celiac and Hashimoto’s Version

I had a chance to discuss this previous post with Art Ayers of Cooling Inflammation. Now, apparently, someone thinks my light, layman's description of the basics of thyroid function wasn't exhaustive. Duh! again. It wasn't intended to be. Once again, for Who?-ever may be listening: I am interested in hacking at the root, not treating the various downstream consequences of that root.

The root is an autoimmune condition, specifically thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibody. One is supposed to have no more than 35 IU/mL (i.e., some level of antibody is normal, just like some level of inflammation is normal) whereas, mine is 216. Now, it's entirely possible that I might still have elevated Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) being produced by my pituitary glad without these out-of-range antibodies. Alternatively, I could just take Levothroid (synthetic T4) in an appropriate dose as I did for nearly a decade (I believe it was about 100mcg) and just ignore all possible root causes. People who make their money from the medical profession seem to have a bias toward the latter approach.

In short, whatever is at play in the entire hormonal / enzymatic signal process to generate appropriate levels of thyroid is mediated in most people (including me) by simply—duh—supplementing the hormone directly (Armour), even synthetic T4. Accordingly, I see no need in doing a copy/paste job from Wikipedia in order to dazzle you about all of it. Rather, I want to hash-imoto out the possible root cause, after a brief introduction about why some simpleton fucktards wave hands, call you quacks, and most importantly, tell you not to look any deeper.

Here's what Art had to say about my previous post and the emails exchanged (with Gemma and Gabriella in tow as well).


I fear these may be fighting words, but alas you seem too timid in your characterization of gut microbiome evolution. Please be not the biofilm wuss that you appear.

Chimera are constructed by the minute. The only stability is that of the physiological niches crudely defined by metabolic functions that are necessarily simultaneously species definitions, but if you pop the hood, an E. coli from Paris is a very different beast from an E. coli made in Caldwell, Idaho. On a DNA sequence basis, they would be as different as dogs and cats.

Richard, I know E. coli and my E. coli are nothing like your E. coli, even though you vainly claim homology by differential agar plates. Your poop will remain your poop.

Bacteria in gut biofilms aggressively extrude their DNA and actively pick up environmental DNA. Recombination produces chimeric new species, and niche selection perpetuates those with advantageous functions, including filling empty niches damaged by antibiotics. It also permits rescue of orphan genes from the diet, e.g. probiotics with beta galactosidase activity to repair lactose intolerance.

Well, for once I didn't OVERSTATE something. :) As I told Art, I try to stick to my pay grade, which is to say: understand all the essentials I can, and rephrase them in a way that inquisitive laymen will understand. At base, I consider my role as one of a promoter of curiosity in areas most people don't otherwise give much thought to (or just regurgitate party lines), not as a therapist or clinician...or even a professor.

Art continues:

But I wish to return to Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. I am not interested in the management of thyroid defects. That is for doctors. I am interested in curing Hashimoto’s by reversing the damage and fixing the cause. The fix is diet to feed body and soul/gut flora.

I have written several posts on the link between celiac and Hashimoto’s. Celiac is initiated by wheat-based trypsin inhibitor and gluten, which cause gut inflammation, Treg deficiency and antigen presentation. The result is anti-tTG antibodies that promote a cellular immune attack on the thyroid gland. The ongoing Treg deficiency promotes presentation of TPO and the production of additional anti-thyroid antibodies. The result is vacillating hypo/hyper thyroidism and Hashimoto’s.

The cure for Hashimoto’s is to:

  1. minimize autoantigen exposure by wheat elimination,
  2. minimize inflammation by vitamin D and fish oil supplementation and
  3. enhance Treg production by repair of gut flora, e.g. resistant starch and other soluble fiber (prebiotics/low glycemic plant polysaccharides), and feeding back lost gut bacteria, e.g. probiotics, fermented vegetables, etc.

...i.e., a general cure for autoimmune diseases, plus consideration of the unusual wheat poly Q toxin, gluten.

Also note that antibiotics or damaging diets may have contributed to the original gut flora damage. Thus a prerequisite of cure is cessation of antibiotic onslaught. As a corollary, since essentially all pharmaceuticals have substantial antibiotic activity, drugs must be avoided and vigilance in gut micro biome defense is required to reverse Hashimoto’s.


What a great guy. Not at all like those Who? sneer at the role of the microbiome out of ignorance, by yelling pewp, for LOLs. And, it's pretty much the protocol I've started, with the added dimension of eliminating alcohol for 3 months. Also, I'll just up my seafood intake for the omega-3. I love all seafood. Just had a nice plate of sushi the other day—a particularly good, non oxidized way to get the 3s.

So, without further ado, here's some posts from Art on the whole gluten, celiac, Hashimoto's, autoimmune connection (or, you can just listen to Who? rant about her complete ignorance in these matters—your choice). If you go to Cooling Inflammation, you can just search 'hashimoto's' to see all posts where he's mentioned it going all the way back to 2009.

I think the connections started here for him:

The Cause of Allegies and Autoimmune Diseases (June 2009)

Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH): Internalized Antigen

Scanning the literature for a common protein that can be used as an experimental antigen, it becomes quickly obvious that a favorite is KLH. This would seem to be an odd choice -- why a keyhole limpet protein? But that is the wrong question.

Why is KLH such a good antigen, i.e. why is it readily presented to the host immune system? If you have been reading my posts, you might be thinking about triplets of basic amino acids and that is the answer.

As soon as I remembered the prominent use of KLH as an antigen, I checked the NCBI protein database and immediately found an unusual KKK (triple lysine) near the amino terminus of hemocyanin II ( it comes in two pieces). This triplet explains why KLH is such a good experimental antigen, because it is internalized into antigen presenting cells by its strong heparin-binding domain. Other components, adjuvants, are typically added to the KLH for injection to make sure that a strong local inflammation occurs.

Autoantigens Have Strong Heparin-Binding Triplet

I also learned that Hashimoto’s thyroiditis is an autoimmune disease mediated by the autoantigen thyroid peroxidase. A quick search reveals that thyroid peroxidase is an autoantigen, because it also has a triplet of basic amino acids that can enhance presentation under inflammatory conditions. Grave’s disease of hyperthyroidism is an autoimmune disease in which the thyroid receptor (with a basic triplet) is an autoantigen. The same kind of triplet of basic amino acids was found when I searched today for fire ant antigens and mosquito antigens.

Celiac Causes Allergies and Autoimmune Diseases (July 2009)

Basic Triplets in Hasimoto’s Autoantigens

One of my hobbies is checking for the unusual occurrence of basic triplets in autoantigens and allergens. I have found dozens of examples. The most recent is associated with Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis. I knew that attack on the thyroid was common in celiacs, because the celiac autoantigen tTG (it has a basic triplet) is also present in the thyroid and the celiac autoantibodies to tTG also cause an attack on the thyroid. But the autoantigen for Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis is thyroid peroxidase (TPO).

I was momentarily perplexed, but then examined the TPO amino acid sequence and immediately found a couple of basic triplets (KKR and KRK).


Autoimmune Diseases, Bacteria and GALT (Gut Associated Immune System) (July 2010)

Celiac, Oxidative Stress, Peroxiredoxin, Alopecia

Grain/gluten intolerance, celiac is an immunological attack on the small intestines with increased risk for numerous autoimmune diseases. Hashimoto’s thyroiditis is a common sequela of celiac and the two diseases share the same autoantigen, tissue transglutaminase (tTG). Thus, the development of celiac and the production of antibodies to the tTG produced in the intestines, results in a subsequent immunological attack on other tissues that produce lots of tTG, e.g. the thyroid. Gluten intolerance, because of its attack on the intestines and the proximity of a major part of the immune system (GALT), may play a major role as the foundation for autoimmune diseases.

Antibiotics, Gluten, Hashimoto's Thyroiditis and Baldness (December 2013)

My impression is that Hashimoto's is caused by a combination of an initial immune attack on the thyroid and incompetent regulatory T cells. In most cases the immune attack on the thyroid is a secondary consequence of celiac/gluten intolerance, in which anti-transglutaminase antibodies attack transglutaminase bound to gluten in the intestines. Transglutaminase is an enzyme that is also produced by the thyroid (and hair follicles) and attack by celiac antibodies can enhance or inhibit thyroid hormone production (or baldness.) Both Hashimoto's and celiac do not occur if the suppressive part of the immune system, i.e. regulatory T cells, is functioning.

Health Diagrams II — Curing Autoimmunity and Allergies (March 2014)

Gut Flora to Tregs to Suppression of Autoimmunity

It is important to understand at the outset that autoimmunity and allergies are caused by a damaged immune system, and repairing the damage cures the diseases. Damage to the immune system typically represents a break in the continual development of immune cells in the lining of the intestines. Immune cell development in the gut is dependent on bacteria, the gut flora. Damage to the gut flora, e.g. by antibiotics, processed foods that lack flora feeding fiber or extreme diets, disrupts development of immune cells. Typically, loss of the immune cells that keep the aggressiveness of the immune system in check, regulatory T cells or Tregs, results in autoimmunity. Fix the gut flora and autoimmunity recedes.


Health Requires Suppression of the Aggressive Immune System

For simplicity, I am focusing on the T cells of the immune system that develop in the intestines and either kill other human cells that are dangerous, e.g. virus-infected or cancer cells, or provide protection by regulating the aggression, Tregs. Normal functioning of the immune cells permits elimination of damaged or dangerous human cells, while at the same time avoiding rampages of lethally armed T killers. Examples of untamed T killers in action are degenerative autoimmune diseases, such as arthritis, asthma, prostatitis, celiac, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, type I diabetes, inflammatory bowel diseases and atherosclerosis.

Here's a final one and perhaps, the most important one because it demonstrates that Professor Art just doesn't profess, he professes to keep thinking.

Celiac, Gluten and Trypsin Inhibitor (October 2014)


Forget the gluten. Celiac is caused by trypsin inhibitors (ATI) that were increased in wheat fifty years ago to combat pests. Immune response to ATI spreads to include gluten and transglutaminase that perpetuates the disease. Celiac is an unexpected consequence of traditional plant breeding that could be fixed with GMO approaches.

Plants Target the Nerves, Immune Cells and Intestines

Plants have evolved chemicals and proteins that attack and punish plant-eating animals. A single molecule of caster bean toxin protein, for example, can kill a human cell. Plants produce some of the most toxic molecules on earth. The nervous system of insects and other herbivores is typically targeted by plants. Many recreational drugs, e.g. opioids, THC, nicotine, caffeine, etc., for example, are made by plants in self defense. Human nerves respond to these natural pesticides and the bitter taste and the vomit reflex help us to detect and avoid toxic phytochemicals. Gluten proteins contain polyglutamine stretches of amino acids that resist digestion and bind to intestinal cells. Seed lectins bind to the glycoproteins on the surface of the intestines and inhibit digestion. Wheat seeds also contain an inhibitor of starch and protein digestion, the amylase/trypsin inhibitor, ATI. ATI binds to the receptors on immune cells that trigger general inflammatory responses to pathogens, e.g. TLR4. It is the ATI in wheat that starts an immune response to gluten and celiac.

Celiac Causes Numerous Autoimmune Diseases

Celiac is often associated with other autoimmune diseases, because it causes them. Antibodies to tTG are diagnostic for celiac and the autoimmune attack on the intestines is mediated by anti-tTG antibodies. But anti-tTG antibodies of celiac don’t just attack the intestines, they attack any other tissues that have tTG, such as the thyroid gland and hair follicles. Thus, it should not be a surprise that celiacs are at high risk for autoimmune disease, e.g. Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, of the thyroid gland, including both hypothyroid and hyperthyroid diseases, depending on which region of the thyroid is attacked. Some forms of hair loss, alopecia, are also initiated by autoimmune attack on the tTG in hair follicles. Persistent exposure of celiacs to gluten will result in a cascade of autoimmune diseases as other body antigens are presented to the immune system and tissues with those antigens are targeted and attacked to produce arthritis, vitiligo, etc.

Cure for Celiac and Autoimmunity

Celiac and other autoimmune diseases are perpetuated by the presence of the corresponding autoantigen/allergen, in this case tTG and gluten proteins, and a deficiency of Tregs. Oddly enough, some pathogens (Helicobacter pylori) and parasites (Helminth worms) stimulate Treg development in the lining of the intestines, in addition to normal gut flora, Clostridium spp. It may be the relative absence of pathogens and parasites in affluent societies that reduces Tregs and enhances the incidence of allergies and autoimmunity. Antibiotics and the antibiotic activity of pharmaceuticals in general may also contribute to Treg deficiencies by damage to gut flora. Clearly, the repair of gut flora and reestablishment of the associated immune system will go a long way toward curing autoimmune diseases such as celiac. Celiac, however, provides the added complexity that it damages the ability of the intestines to maintain a functional gut flora. Thus, the cure for celiac would require simultaneous repair of both the gut and its flora, e.g. by a fecal transplant and supportive diet containing numerous soluble fibers to which the donor flora have been previously adapted, i.e. lacking antigenic triggers.

OK, so, the heckler (Who?) is irrelevant to all of this—and not just because she's a 30-something narcissist virgin who had liposuction and pretended it was low carb, who used to publish about 30 selfies per day on her Twitarded feed (now by invitation only). That just makes it all the more fun to me, to have her lipo-induced tiny parties in a bunch. Guy has to have his misogynistic fun, yo!

No. It's about always asking questions, above asserting answers. Hell, about a week ago I wan't even seeking questions, and I had no answers. Since then, I have tons of the former and only hints at the latter, so I keep pursuing it, drilling down, and cataloging all of it, just in case any of you find similar proclivities suitable.

The very essential difference between me and all the promoters of conventional wisdom—including those who feign same, but then defend to the death their own versions of "myth busting" (e.g., keto crowd) that's no more revelatory than conventional wisdom itself—is that I question them, too.

I'm agnostic toward all answers. Questions too.

Is this a question, statement, or both: who is being honest, and Who? is being dishonest?

Quick Newsflash: Matt Stone & Co. aka Archangel Ink Is Publishing a Gut Biome Book

Well, I ended up revealing the secret I was saving up for drama, and I did so in comments, so here's the deal.

I was so very impressed with Todd Dosenberry's handling of the Buck Books Promotion and so liked the sane, a-la-carte value proposition, that it didn't take long to find out that Matt Stone is a driving force behind it. Matt and I have a history, and this is just one of those posts.

I got in contact, we lafed about history, and he and Rob—after some reservations that took long enough to check out the draft and the market—have agreed to front one hell of a lot of sweat in terms of paying people, in order to get this book out there. We're looking at end of Feb timeframe. Plus, Todd has some list building to do via his continuing promotions. Archangel Ink. Check them out.

Here's another tidbit. Matt and I actually had an exchange last April 1, when people pointed me to his newsletter release on that day, thinking I'd get pissed or something. Actually, I busted a gut and told him so. He invited me to get back at him this next April, and I assure you: I've had it outlined for months.

Anyway, these guys are very legit and I've even bounced their offerings off people who generally hate everything. And even they say, impressive.

Isn't life stranger than fiction?

Oh...yes; for a time, Mark Sisson and I were planning to deal together. As you may know, Mark also participates the the Buck Book deals. Anyway, Mark and I are perfectly cool about this, just in case you were wondering.

...In the meantime, I now have both Beatrice and Tim asking me, "aren't you supposed to be working on a book?"

One last thing: Buck Flogging.

Thanks For All The Dumb People in Comments

Over the last days, given my activities, I have had tons of comments. None got through, except those known to The Club.

So you haven't seen them. Unlike folks like Dr. Michael Eades and Jimmy Moore, I have never, ever not put through or deleted a comment that was on the science, no matter how it may disagree. Never, not once, and there are replete examples of the former doing that.

Rather, I have what's called 1st comment moderation. Think of it as going up to the doorman of a popular nightclub. How do you behave? I'd guess better than you actually have to, all the time, once you get in.

Here's how stupid the people who hang out at Grace's and Who's blog are. They give me one line insults. They don't even exercise any effort beyond writing a single sentence. It's like saying to the doorman, "just let me in, you ugly stupid cunt!"

But, lots who read Grace and Who, and begin to do so sycophantically, are fucktards. They don't even know that little bit much. That to get in here and then have a little dispensation in comments, including being able to tell me I'm fucked up, you have to get in the door first. It would be pretty stupid of me to just let anyone in...and another way to think of it is that once you're in, you aren't burdened by what stranger fucktards do. I keep them out so you can be real.

Have fun and be careful and thoughtful out there. I'm going to see The Exodus tonight, because I hear tell it's written by an atheist and doG is portrayed as a spoiled little cunt-brat, like me. About time we had a The Ten Commandments remake, though I did love the film as a kid. Thing is, I'm not omnipotent, so can't harm you...and more importantly, all those people you suck up to can't make you believe I can hurt you, cunty as I may be...

In other news, I saw (Bea and I do movies come Holiday season) The Theory of Everything Saturday, Foxcatcher last night. I predicted McConauhey would get best actor for Dallas Buyer’s Club last year. This year, gonna be competition between Eddie Redmayne as Stephen Hawking (must see), and Steve Carell as John DuPont. I think Steve edges out. I looked for a single sign of That Steve Carell all the fucking film. It's almost a distraction, but that cannot be his fault. Go Steve. I've never been a particular fan, but I know fucking hard work applied to a talent when I see it.

Autoimmunity, Genetic Engineering, and the Gut Biome

Here's what I'm up to in terms of drilling down on my Hashimoto's Thyroiditis. I'm reasonably familiar with the hormonal / enzymatic "pathways." Duh that the principle TSH feedback is T4, which is why the synthetic T4 I was on from about 1998 - 2007 brought the TSH right down.

However, assuming I had the TPO antibody that antagonizes this enzyme, that basically "makes" T4, then the synthetic T4 supplementation was merely large enough to overcome it and bring down TSH. Easy peasy. It stands to reason that addressing the root, i.e., the antibody, then T4 production might be sufficient on its own and TSH will come down to normal.

A little background. I stopped the T4 sometime in 2007, along with sinus allergy meds and PPIs for GERD, in order to see how well LC Paleo, intermittent fasting, and my workout program worked to eliminate those needs. It worked for the other two (and my BP came down so meds for that was no longer on the table), but a TSH in 2008 had it at 16, so no joy there (2-3 outta 3-4 'aint bad), and instead of going back on the synthetic T4, I opted for Armour, with subsequent tests putting me in range. I then stopped that a couple of years ago, while increasing carbs, and then later, the whole resistant starch and gut stuff happened. I tested last week with an improved THS in an untreated state.

Am I onto something? I think it's a legitimate question, not kookiness or quackery. And plus, I'm asymptomatic, in spite of 30-something-crazy-virgin-bitch's fucktarded but  "authoritative" assertion  that life is a shambles because of untreated hypothyroidism. More plus, I can start meds any time I want. If this doesn't pan out, I will, and I'll just do the synthetic.

70% of the immune system is in the gut. There are enormous associations between autoimmune conditions and the state of the gut and the resident biome. I've come to think a bit differently about the gut in terms of resident species. Two primary reasons:

  1. It evolves at a rate of up to many generations every 24 hours.
  2. Horizontal gene transfer is another layer of this evolution.

The problem with speciation is that the xyz species of bacteria you have today may not be precisely the same genetically as the one you had yesterday. So, why not just think of it as a massive genome containing about 300 times the number of genes as your human cells? I understand that species classification is helpful, but it's not fundamentally what's going on.

Or, to think of it another way: when you introduce different bacteria via probiotics, and then target feeding them—understanding species are engaged in chemical warfare, are in competition for food—you're essentially practicing genetic engineering on yourself. Not your human genes, but a genome that affects your own gene expression or repression in various ways.

Neither do I want to overemphasize. After all, it took about 20 years and 50,000 generational turnovers for some of 12 strains of E. coli to emerge into what might be classified a new species.

The E. coli long-term evolution experiment is an ongoing study in experimental evolution led by Richard Lenski that has been tracking genetic changes in 12 initially identical populations of asexual Escherichia coli bacteria since 24 February 1988.[1] The populations reached the milestone of 50,000 generations in February 2010 and 60,000 in in April 2014.[2]

Since the experiment's inception, Lenski and his colleagues have reported a wide array of genetic changes; some evolutionary adaptations have occurred in all 12 populations, while others have only appeared in one or a few populations. One particularly striking adaption was the evolution of a strain of E. coli that was able to use citric acid as a carbon source in an aerobic environment.[3]

If you drill down, you'll find it's that use of citric acid where it arguably emerges as a new species classification.

Of course, given the number and the exponential combinations of potential interactions, all within a framework of rapid evolution given their high generational turnover, it's too complex to consciously engineer in a precise manner. So we go with associations: what do lean healthy people eat? What does their microbial genetic profile look like? And yes, classification in terms of species is yet another way we simplify or break down the problem into chunks.

I've been scrounging a lot of stuff (thanks people), but here's a couple of papers and a link I've been chewing on today.

Alright, or just take your thyroid meds and don't be quacky or stupid... Above all, don't think for yourself. Listen to crazy bitches, conventional MD's, and all who present as an authority. You can't just stop your thyroid meds, you know. You just can't! Well, I fucking did, twice. So far, I'm better, but still drilling down.

[Insert pussy-ass "disclaimer," here. Or, you're on your own.]

It’s Downright Amazing What You Can Learn About Yourself From People Who’ve Never Met You

I like quiet Saturday and Sunday mornings. It's for this reason that I often find myself getting my ass out of bed earliest—about 5am this particular Sunday morning. Began catching up on emails, Google alerts, etc.

Low & behold, I got a complete education on myself I had no idea of, courtesy of a rather crazy person and her solipsist readers.

Well, at least I now know that:

- My plan to do a 3-month experiment to see how much, if any, I can improve hypothyroidism (here and here) is plain quackery. And here I thought that my Kaiser primary physician, Haas, MD, had blessed the experiment, said he's seen stranger things, so why not, and already approved the next round of lab work. And while I thought I'd consulted Chris Kresser, not to contradict my mainstream doc, but to see if the approach my doc had already said sounded good, jived with his clinical experience, but apparently not. Oh, well. Back to the drawing board.

- I'm having suicidal thoughts. And here I thought that was five years ago, back in the winter of 2010 where, for the first time in my life, I had months of chronic pain as a result of a herniated cervical disc (likely from pulling heavy deadlifts at #325 for reps), confirmed by MRI. I'd thought that I'd worked that out and this time around, no such thing because the pain doesn't worry me anymore in terms of putting up with it for life. But what do I know?

- My current back, hip, and leg pain—along with tingling in my left foot—is linked to my hypothyroidism, general ill health, and a slew of other conditions I wasn't aware of until today. And here I thought that, save for the thyroid panel (with untreated TSH better today than 7 years ago), I just had the best blood work I've ever had. And what a surprise to learn that the radiologist's report from the MRI I had a week ago is unrelated to my pain.

Individual axial levels as follows:

T12-L1: Normal

L1-L2: Normal

L2-L3: Normal

L3-L4: Normal

L4-L5: There is loss of disc height with disc desiccation. There
is presence of a left posterior lateral to far lateral disc
protrusion measuring 5 mm. This abuts the left L4 and L5 nerve
roots. Correlate for appropriate nerve symptoms. There is moderate
left neural foraminal narrowing and mild central canal stenosis.
There is no right neural foraminal narrowing.

L5-S1: Normal

Additional findings: None.

- S

Left posterior lateral to far lateral L4-L5 disc protrusion abuts
the left L4 and L5 nerve roots. Correlate for appropriate nerve
root symptoms.

And won't longtime reader Rick Mehaffy of Peninsula RSI be surprised to learn that the hour and a half I spent in his chamber of horrors yesterday as he poked, prodded, stretched, put me in traction, and hung me upside-down, was not about the MRI report, but about my thyroid. Perhaps I should get another thyroid panel, since I had measurable relief all the rest of the day. Or, perhaps there's something to this notion that spinal alignment underlies all disease and Rick is just very clever, making me believe he was actually treating an apparent spinal injury! Clever man!

And next, I'm going to have to let my dad and two younger brothers know that those 2" scars they all sport on their lower backs has nothing to do with the conspiracy underlying an MRI finding identical to mine, but that it's actually a revolutionary new technique to conduct surgery on the thyroid glad, cure depression, anxiety, and/or whatever else may ail you, according to the exclusive authority of people who've never met you. Won't they be surprised!

- I live apart from my wife. And here I thought the woman in the next room here in San Jose is my wife—including time spent in Mexico, SoCal, and Las Vegas over Thanksgiving with her parents and looking forward to a Tahoe trip with my parents next weekend. I hope she doesn't find out the truth!

- I don't make any money anymore, and even have to clean my own cabin vacation rental because occupancy is down and I can't afford a cleaner. And here I thought that I was finishing up 2014 with the highest income for that property in the four years since renting it out. I was also pretty sure that I was dissatisfied with the level of cleanliness, had a parting of the ways, and that while looking for another cleaning vendor and I did it myself, that it was a good way to move around, given the back and leg pain that's all in my head...or was it hypothyroid...can't remember.

And what a shock to find out that after selling out my 2014 right to occupy contract with The Grand Solmar in Cabo (10 weeks per year) by the end of March, then popping for an additional contact, then selling that one out for 2014 (another 10 weeks per year), it's only because of poverty.

I sure wish that 89 bookings in 2014, and 19 so far for 2015 between the three rentals was enough to keep me out of the poor house.

...The truth about yourself is out there, folks. You just have to stop hiding and accept it!

["Clown car" indeed.]

Fear of Raw Potato Starch Ingestion is Probably Irrational

Unfortunately, a certain blogger still seems more interested in promoting that irrational fear. I'll leave it to readers to discern motivations.

So, first a little housecleaning. I waffle back and forth between regretting taking down a post laying out my beefs with Ms. Grace Liu, and being relieved because of the involvement or proximity of other parties. The latter outweighs the former, so it will forever remain as is. I was also relieved because it presented an opportunity to move forward and debate the science: Moving Forward: My Approach to Evaluating the Science and Knowledge of the Gut Biome and Resistant Starch.

I'm moving forward alright, but with absolutely zero contact or collaboration with Ms. Liu. She is simply not behaving in accordance with, or in the spirit of our agreement when she asked me to take down the post and I agreed, with conditions.

Hours after I made 100% good on my end, I get an email asking to make sure I acknowledge her "contributions" in the book, going so far as to say, explicitly, that everything Tim Steele has said or written since October of 2013, he got from her. Without agreeing with her delusion, I grit my teeth and agree that I will acknowledge her, even offering to email a pre-publication copy to make sure it was to her satisfaction.

Then, this comment shows up in her blog: "I have warned Mr Nikoley as well - the high dosage RPS for over the last 1-2 years probably prevented the healing of his autoimmune Hashimoto's." I feel embarrassed to even have to refute such illogical muddled balderdash. My untreated TSH improved between 2008 and today. It was normal during 2010 - 2012 because I was on medication, which I ceased over two years ago and have not had a test of any kind until last week. Moreover, I told Ms. Liu this in an email and the answer back was 'no, potato starch compromised your gut and that's why you didn't heal.' It's like saying: Yea, your hypothyroidism got better during the last 2 ears of not being on medication, but it's because of the RPS it's not improved more! Pretty illogical; as unfalsifiable as it is unprovable. Incidentally, I just had two comments on my blog this morning from guys whose TSH has gone down since supplementing PS.

Then, the kicker in her comments this morning. I suspect she's answering her own sock puppet.

Anonymous said...
RN is a little skank and i support you. so will other people.

Dr. B G said...
Thank you Anon. I appreciate your warm support. I won't be silenced, by lies or skankiness. ;)

The final thing is Tim's post that I will address below: Raw Potato Starch; A Great Prebiotic!

Accordingly, the following outlines my course of action moving forward.

  1. This will be the very last time I will speak or write of Grace Liu in any way; will accept no contact from her, regardless of context or terms.
  2. I have taken steps to have all 700+ links to her blog going back to 2008 (352 of them from her) expunged from mine.
  3. I will not acknowledge any asserted "contributions" by her in any manner.

Now, on the matter of Tim's post, one of the falsehoods bandied about is that we encouraged people to load up on raw potato starch with no concern for food or other fiber supplements. I already addressed that, but let me reiterate. Here's a comment by Tatertot himself in the very first post we did on resistant starch.

I have heard that banana flour and plantain flour is the same thing.

Raw Potato Starch contains virtually no micronutrients. The banana/plantain flours contain more as they are not isolated starch, but the whole ground fruit.

Inulin powder is not RS, but it is a plant fiber that resists digestion. It is usually avoided by people with FODMAP intolerance, while potato starch is not a FODMAP. That being said, Inulin powder would probably be a good choice to put a bit of in a smoothy with potato starch as Inulin is considered to be a prebiotic, just like potato starch.

Taro powder also probably has very little RS as it seems to be made of amylopectin starch, which is not resistant. If you read up on ‘Poi’, which is fermented taro, it sounds like a really good source of nutrition.

I’m thinking a really good idea would be to make a mix of known RS starches and prebiotics, like potato starch, taro powder, banana flour, inulin, etc… and make a smoothy or mix with milk or yogurt every day. Go heavy on the potato starch or banana flour and a bit of the others.

And here's what he wrote in the post itself:

Edibility-wise, potato starch is not bad. It mixes well with any liquid and has no real taste and is not gritty, mealy, or pastey. I've eaten up to 4TBS (48g), which is 30-35g of RS, on an empty stomach with no digestive problems. I think it is a very good addition to your arsenal of RS foods.

So, after months of research, it's come down to this: I eat potatoes almost every day, cooked in a variety of ways, a few raw slices, and lots of cold potatoes. I eat sushi when I can, beans on rare occasion, and I keep a baggy full of dried plantains on the counter to snack on. When I buy bananas, I get the greenest ones I can find. Sushi is eaten guilt free, especialy with raw fish and seaweed. I will eat legumes from time to time if thoughtfully prepared to remove toxins. I also keep a container of potato starch on the counter and am finding all kinds of ways to use it--in smoothies, milk, kefir, mixed with water and eaten with berries and mashed bananas, or just mixed with water and drank.

In short, PS was merely an entry point for some, particularly LCers and diabetics who were unsure of adding any digestible carbohydrate to their diet. One thing it did do for most people is convince them in no uncertain terms that the gut biome is very important. That there are clear effects is hard to miss.

And yet, in Ms. Liu's (neither will I refer to her as "Dr.") comments, she has some so irrationally fearful that I've seen stuff of the form, 'oh thank you thank you thank you; I'm so upset that Tim and Richard put the health of myself and my family at risk.' Her responses to these kinds of comments generally signal, to me, what her underlying motivations are in this.

Tim's post is about a single variable science experiment with 4 individuals, covering a six week intervention with a single intervention theme (1 subject had it in kefir, another with a bit of psyllium). You guessed it: raw potato starch. Some of you actually helped make this happen by funding the project.

I'll not take away Tim's thunder and besides, he does a very careful job of laying out the testing hypothesis, something I find quite refreshing vis-a-vis the manner in which Ms. Liu presents her assertions.

  1. Well, clear stated hypothesis
  2. Logical set of questions for research to answer
  3. Establishes a clear standard of success by means of reference to the very latest published research (November, 2014)
  4. Presents clear results that meet the standard of success

Here's the punchline. These four species are specifically mentioned as important targets of attention in the research Tim cites.

Gut Resuls2

Tim says:

To recap the dietary interventions:

Adult 1 - Added 4TBS of potato starch daily
Adult 2 - Added 2TBS of potato starch daily, mixed with kefir
Child 1 - Added 1TBS of potato starch daily, plus 1tsp of psyllium husk
Child 2 - Added 1TBS of potato starch daily

The dietary intervention lasted for 6 weeks, and the final fecal samples were taken on the last day.

An examination of the data shows that each subject had considerable increases in bifidobacterium, and mainly increases in the other bacteria suggested as targets for prebiotics by Rastall and Gibson. The slight decreases were most pronounced in the subject (Child 2) who ate the least amount of total fiber supplements, but ironically, this subject also had the largest increase in bifidobacteria.

The species of bifidobacteria detected in the samples were ~95% Bifidobacterium breve, with smaller amounts of animalis, dentium, longum, and pseudolongum.

So, even being skeptical of sequencing results, it seems pretty difficult and downright unreasonable to make a claim that raw potato starch harmed any of these subjects over six weeks, a claim Ms. Liu has been asserting for months in a bunch of posts.

Roasted Chicken and Pinto Beans

 It's so Paleo Anarchy.

IMG 2811
2:00 PM "Break Fast"

...Makes me feel sorry for the Paleo Rabbits with their bales of greens and a side of hubris. Could this kinda thing help you break through that "LC Stall?"

“Stalling” in Wheat Belly and LC Weight Loss After Amazing Strides

Subject near and dear to my heart, and if you're one who throws in the towel for a year, two, or even more, I'm your "authority."

There is one aspect that doesn't get enough attention, in my view. It's a fuzzy thing, because it's something that could happen in your 20s, but most likely won't. Could hapen in your 30s, but easy to catch for most (I came soooooo close—'cause I saw the nefarious progression but punted). In your 40s and beyond, you're most likely going to face real pain and adversity (give me a star!).

Let's just cut to the chase, and I'll follow up on the backside. Comment from a new reader, George.

I have been doing Wheat belly for 3 months. Lost 20 lbs in the first month and then nothing for 2 months, actually gaining a little bit. Not much, but a little bit. Dr Davis has a link to your site so that’s how I found out about the importance about resistant starches. I had a blood panel, have had high cholesterol for some time, and my values got better, a lot better. My question to you is, what is your take on the wheat belly “diet” with low carbs and high fat? I started on PS, green banana, green Mazango (name??) bananas, psyllium husk, probiotics in a milk shake with kefir in the morning and one in the evening. GREAT FARTS :) and getting really regular which hasn’t happened in years. I will have a new blood panel done to see the results. Hopefully a lot better. Thank for all the work you have done!

My reply:


First, thanks for not just doing 4 TBS in a glass of water, but incorporating it into what you eat and using other stuff to target gut.

Smart move.

I like Bill Davis. He’s been good to me over the years.

Yes, the weight loss/stall story with low carb is legend. What happens is that when you cut out the grains and processed food in general, you aren’t feeding opiate receptors, so your natural hunger impulses moderate. It’s not perfect, because you still have weight to carry around. But anyway, you naturally take on an average caloric deficit without hunger, and thus drop weight. However, in very many people, especially those not in their 20s anymore, the caloric deficit you adopt doesn’t correspond to your resting metabolic high school weight, but more often your more couch potatoish self at 35 or something. So, you “stall” 10, 20, 30 pounds from where you’d like to be.

You’ve reached homeostasis.

That’s why those last pounds can be tough. Think of it this way. You raised your set point by just getting older: hormones don’t crank as well, cells have hearing loss. Add processed food specifically engineered to make you hungry and want more, you add another layer. Fortunately, that layer seems relatively easy to eliminate. But the elevation in set point, not so much.

Anyway, the end point here is that it was not about the low carb, it was eliminating the grains and the processed foods they came with.

I’d advise you become carb agnostic; but, eat your carbs from whole sources: rice, potatoes, beans. Also, be mindful of fat, especially added fat.

Think of it this way: engineering processed foods with grains, sugar, salt and fat to make you crave and smoke…sorry…eat more, is really just a technological advancement from the same thing in even ancestral diets, making food way more palatable and desirable by rendering or extracting fat from some foods, and adding them to others.

Heard of the potato diet that works like 100% of the time and everyone has to eventually stop or they’ll end up looking like a concentration camp survivor? …Yes, the absolutely most sure way to loose weight by stuffing yourself is a very high carbohydrate diet of potatoes with no (or minuscule) added fat, but instead: herbs & spices, or non-fat sauces (like veggie purees). Now, do the potato diet, but heap on butter, sour cream, and bacon bits (our proto-processed foods) and see how that diet works out. You’ll pour on pounds.


I'll just say that everything began to change pretty quickly and well for me when I recognized that fat gluttony is just gluttony, Paleo/LC, or whatever. Nobody should be phobic about fat. But, eat it primarily in real food the way it came (e.g., like whole milk instead of cream or butter) and if you add, then do so as you'd do herbs & spices, and just see what happens.

My final take is that I don't believe Bill Davis is truly a fan of gluttonous fat diets as celebrated by low carbers. I think it was a pragmatic decision on his part to come in under the LC umbrella, proposing they eliminate grains. You see, because of the LC requirement, mainstream LC has become processed enough to be in the Kellogg's Hall of Fame. It's a messy disaster. But one way to look at it is Bill Davis as a subversive influence. I think he wears a white hat in this. 

Keith Norris on the Anarchy of Paleo

It goes without saying that one aspect of the Paleolithic was that not only were there no central governments, but likely no "traditional" hierarchical structures amongst hunter-gatherer tribes. The first meat, fat, plant eating anarchists.

I skim or read a lot of stuff out there every day. Sadly however, so much of it is merely regurgitating the same old Paleo dogmas. Moreover, they have attained dogmatic status because they've been repeated over and over, and they get repeated over and over because there's some authority behind them, and who doesn't like to speak with authority?

Fortunately, every now and then, I see something that has to be shared. In this case, Keth Norris' post: Paleo: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly... and the Misinformed. Keith has always liked to begin his posts with a quote that prefigures what he's writing about in some way, and this is no exception.

“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” - Aristotle

So I knew I had to read on. It reminded me of my heavy Internet debating back in the mid-90s. One guy in one of the USENET forums I frequented was David Friedman (yea, son of Milton). He was a ferociously skilled debater (yea, he's an anarchist, too) and used to say, paraphrasing: "when you write out your argument, always have in mind the very best argument against it you can think of." I'd add that doing so is a good way to make your argument the least wrong you can make it.

So consider that the anarchy of ideas is and ought to be a very core feature of evolving (getting less wrong all the time) Paleo thought. It's this ethic in play, underlying all of the great debates like safe starches, carbohydrate agnosticism, potatoes, ketogenic diets, and so on. Perhaps legumes will be next. This isn't to say that slippery-slope fearing pushback isn't understandable ("what's next, Paleo Hot Pockets?"). But, so long as people are making clear and critical distinctions there's no compelling reason to have undue fear of so-called slippery slopes, in my view.

Here's the paragraph that compelled me to share my thoughts with you.

I’ll be so blunt as to put it this way: I don’t think the full scope of Paleo is for everyone, because I don’t believe that everyone is capable of operating with knowledge and reason as their sole platform. Shifting sands make some folks uncomfortable; some have to operate under conditions of rules and rigid order. In other words, some will never move beyond the dog paddle to the more complex strokes. Fall in the drink and they'll be able to save themselves alright, but they'll never be a swimmer in the true sense of the term. And that’s fine; I get that—and Paleo can accommodate. I can package a version of this diet to anyone, making their lives much better in the process.

Yep, even a ketogenic one, I suppose.

...If you've not seen it before, about 18-minutes, my AHS12 talk: Paleo Epistemology and Sociology. The theme is Quality of Knowledge, i.e., upon what is it based? Juxtaposed, for Paleoman, it was based on what was observed in his environment, by means of his sense organs and their integration in his rational mind. But in the Neolithic, "knowledge" is often based on various tyrannies promoted by various authorities, regurgitated out as memes for general consumption.

Don't be that guy.

Moving Forward: My Approach to Evaluating the Science and Knowledge of the Gut Biome and Resistant Starch

Time to look forward. There's no question that since my very first post on resistant starch in April, 2013, things have changed in a number of ways. I like to think that the more than 130 posts related to resistant starch or the microbiome in some way—many including contributions by others, like Tim Steele and Grace Liu—have contributed to the general impact of recognizing the importance of gut health and the role of resistant starch in the whole picture. Since there's now a number of voices out there on the topic and some dispute about some things, I thought I might put some rules or guidelines out there I'm going to use to evaluate things moving forward.

The MetaRulz

  1. The vast majority of what's to be known and understood about the complex workings of the human microbiome and its interactions with the host remains to be discovered.
  2. The things we think we know and understand are mostly wrong or incomplete in some way.
  3. The struggle is in the process of becoming less wrong over time, not in searching for ways of being right.

The ThumbRulz

  1. We don't know what the "ideal" gut microbiome looks like. It's more likely there's no such thing.
  2. Gut bug composition changes meal to meal and season to season. RNA sequencing, then, is perhaps best done in a fasted state of at least 24 hours to get a better idea of an individual's "metagut."
  3. RNA sequencing is flawed, where even the same sample taken in the exact same spot yields some vastly different results.
  4. Hunter gatherer guts are probably of limited value to non huntger-gatherers. Perhaps better would be the sequences of people in your neck of the woods, same age and gender, who are lean and have a clean medical history (esp. no signs of autoimmune disorders).
  5. Just because a particular species of gut bacteria is generally associated with good things doesn't automatically mean that more of it is better. 1% of 100 trillion is a very big number.
  6. Excluding testing error (#3), a decrease in a species associated with good stuff could have a number of explanations: all good, all bad, or a mix. For example, if Akkermansia drops in population, could it be because something else good increased and the previous levels of Akk are no longer necessary, or needed?
  7. Is a different mix and relative proportion of bugs called for in a diseased person than a healthy person; and moreover, is it possible that the mix in the diseased person is actually helping them from getting worse, rather than a direct cause of their state of disease?
  8. Horizontal gene transfer is a factor in all of this, and I don't think sequencing is yet sophisticated enough to detect that. In other words, it's the genes and their expression in the gut that's fundamentally important, not species classification (just a way for us
  9. Some humans, owing to their specific human genetic makeup, i.e., what needs expressing and what needs repressing, and control of specific pathogens, will require different sets of genes in their gut.
  10. Some species associated with good (or bad) stuff may have significant members of their ranks "hiding out" in mucosal layers, biofilms, whatever, and be relatively undetectable in sequencing tests.
  11. One thing we do seem to have a pretty good handle on is clear pathogens (or overgrowths of even "good" bugs) and this should dominate therapeutic intervention for now. Once that's out of the way, we'll have all the time in the world to worry about boutique bugs.

There may be more. Feel free to suggest. I already incorporated some stuff by Gemma in the last few rulz.

Ok, so one issue at hand now, spearheaded by Grace (link removed), is questions over the propriety of using raw potato starch as a supplement, or perhaps more poignantly, in high dose. It's important to go back to the beginning, the very first post, and look at how this all got started. In the words of Tim Steele.

Most scientists used 20-50 grams RS per day in their human studies. Most recommendations are for the ingestion of 20-40g/day for maximum benefit, and there seems to be an upper limit of about 60g where it stops being effective, and a lower limit of about 20g where it has little effect.

My next step was to target RS in the 20-60g/day range from common foods...this proved difficult.

I learned there was a bit of RS in cooked and cooled rice, like sushi rice, but only a small amount, like 5g per cup.

He goes on to lay out the RS content of a bunch of common foods, then suggests potato starch at the end as supplement, alternative. Check it out. And, later on, Tim painstakingly put together a 5-page PDF listing RS in a whole bunch of foods, by weight.

And yes, in spite of that, a lot of people ignored trying to get much from foods, because they come in grains and starches. You know why? The Very Low Carb Menace, that's why. In Tim's case, he was already eating lots of cooked and cooled potatoes, beans, and his own dried green plantains. In my case, I did the 4 TBS daily for a while, then went intermittent (1, 0, 3, 6, 0, 0, 0, 2, etc.). Now, sometimes I go a week or more with zero and a while back went more than a month with zero. Why? Because I eat plenty of beans and potatoes. Rice sometimes. Even bread...very only sometimes (doing my part for hormesis).

Nonetheless, if we are to look at studies showing that high dose raw potato starch is a questionable practice, which I'm willing to do, we have to look at anecdotes or, more accurately, the relative lack thereof. But, one thing out of the way: I agree, a regime that's like 4 TBS every morning at 6:38 am, with the exact same smoothie or food, is not the best approach. Intermittency and variation in all things, please.

This morning, I scanned through all sales via my Amazon shopping link (13,200 orders) from April, 2013 to today, looking for products associated with gut health. Here's the list with order totals:

Tons of other things gut related, but I excluded anything with less than 10 orders. There's also the case of commenter Wilbur, who takes all manner of various powdered fibers and claims impressive results.

Take home points:

  1. There is one hell of a lot of people worldwide experimenting with potato starch and to lesser extent, other fibers. And probiotics (the soil-based ones as Grace harped on almost from the beginning) are pretty huge. Add to that their mention now on hundreds of other blogs and websites, using their own associates links. Add to that, the the folks who just grab it at the supermarket, as I sometimes do. Very lots.
  2. If the argument that ritual supplementing of 4 TBS or thereabouts daily is not the best approach, zero argument from me. More on that below.
  3. If the argument, however, is that this stuff is really going to harm you (and some have been using it for 20 months), then I need to see some really compelling anecdotal evidence of that. Instead, what we have is thousands of positive anecdotes in comments (and I get many emails), compared to a relatively small percentage where some level of discomfort was experienced, like bloating, joint pain, rash, etc.
  4. I don't think that a changed gut RNA sequence cuts it, for reasons outlined in the thumbrulz, above, and especially if not accompanied by some sort of clear physical downstream effect that shows up significantly in a lot of people. We are still bound to the scientific method, here.

But again, this may not even be worth arguing because I am all on board with expanding the mix. First of all, eat the damn food! Second, if you do supplement, then keep it real, use a mix of the prebiotics, and incorporate the probiotics, especially the dirt.

So, right now, I'm experimenting with mixes of a variety of stuff. Usually, it's about a third to half PS, then a bunch of other stuff from above, and Wilbur's list too. And yes, I hope to develop a product once I nail down proportions I like and do some beta testing. Yes, you'll know the ingredients, but the proportions will be my trade secret. The idea is that by using economies of scale to purchase bulk, I can get you a single product with a mix of about a dozen things that costs less than buying all of them, saves space, saves the trouble of spooning out individually or mixing yourself, and ads convenience to your life. Of course, anyone can develop such a product, BUT ONLY ONE WILL BE CALLED..."ANIMAL FARTS!" :)

Now, when I have a smoothie, which is maybe 3-4 times per week: it's 1 raw egg, two heaping TBS of my mix (roughly 40% PS), 3-4 oz orange juice, the rest of the 14 total oz topped off with whole milk. I don't bother with blenders anymore and I'll just eat fruit. I put all that in one of those 14 oz shakers with an agitator ball in it. Comes out perfectly smooth, tasting creamy like an Orange Julius. It's the only smoothie recipe I need; might use other fruit juices sometimes.

A final note, about my Hashimoto's announced here, and expounded upon here, with input by Chris Kresser. Some points:

  1. Since I've had elevated TSH since about 1998-2000 when it first showed up on a blood test, it's likely that it was the same autoimmune condition.
  2. I can't recall what those numbers were back then, but in 2008 my TSH was 16 in a 1-5 reference range.
  3. One would expect the condition to get worse over time. TSH was in normal range in the 2009-2011 timeframe because I was on Armour Thyroid, which of course does not address the underlying issue of the elevated TPO antibody.
  4. While I don't have a TPO AB reference point, since my TSH went from 16 to just under 10 from 2008 to now, and I haven't been on any meds in 2-3 years, it's more likely that I have LESS TPO antibody now, not more.
  5. ...Meaning that the WORST one can say about my supplementation with raw potato starch over the last 20 months is that it almost certainly did not make this autoimmune condition worse (and if there's any effect at all, it's far more likely to have been a positive one).

But, now I'm interested in fixing it. First, I have to get rid of things I don't need that may be adversely impacting my gut: all alcohol, gluten, processed and fast foods. It's not like I do a lot of the latter, but I can get pretty sloppy. Thankfully, I've been pretty weight stable at around 185 for months now.

So, gonna eliminate all that stuff, drop 20 pounds, get off my ass and exercise more, and really target the gut with foods and my powder mixes and probiotics and a few other supplements, do it for 90 days and retest in mid-March.

With me ruck.

Update: Well, the truce didn't last long. I have permanently severed all ties with Ms. Liu:

Fear of Raw Potato Starch Ingestion is Probably Irrational