Comments on: I’m Just Sayin’ http://freetheanimal.com/2007/06/im_just_sayin.html Expressing Our Primal Genes for Lean Health, Vitality and Attractiveness Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:11:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Richard Nikoley http://freetheanimal.com/2007/06/im_just_sayin.html#comment-4671 Richard Nikoley Sun, 17 Jun 2007 08:18:35 +0000 http://localhost/animal/2007/06/im_just_sayin.html#comment-4671 <p>Kyle:</p> <p>You forgot about the likely toilet paper connection.</p> <p>Personally, I think that everything in politics and public policy is (to me) a thinly veiled international plot to get <i>everyone</i> using toilet paper for the benefit of multinational corporations. How many of do you think hold an interest in pulp production, manufacture, and distribution? Huh?</p> <p>Think about it.<br /> </p> Kyle:

You forgot about the likely toilet paper connection.

Personally, I think that everything in politics and public policy is (to me) a thinly veiled international plot to get everyone using toilet paper for the benefit of multinational corporations. How many of do you think hold an interest in pulp production, manufacture, and distribution? Huh?

Think about it.

]]> By: Kyle Bennett http://freetheanimal.com/2007/06/im_just_sayin.html#comment-4670 Kyle Bennett Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:45:28 +0000 http://localhost/animal/2007/06/im_just_sayin.html#comment-4670 <p>I bet they all eat carrots, too.</p> I bet they all eat carrots, too.

]]> By: Michael Roborne http://freetheanimal.com/2007/06/im_just_sayin.html#comment-4669 Michael Roborne Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:01:34 +0000 http://localhost/animal/2007/06/im_just_sayin.html#comment-4669 <p>Most of the 2008 presidential candidates are backed by the money of David Rockefeller in one way or another, and that money is being spent for the purpose of pushing forward the agenda for One World Government, which will greatly benefit international corporations.</p> <p>All of these candidates are members of David Rockefeller's Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which advocates One World Government --</p> <p>Fred Thompson (also a member of the pro-war American Enterprise Institute)<br /> Rudy Giuliani<br /> John McCain<br /> Mitt Romney<br /> Jim Gilmore<br /> Newt Gingrich<br /> Hillary Clinton<br /> Barack Obama<br /> John Edwards<br /> Joe Biden<br /> Chris Dodd<br /> Bill Richardson</p> Most of the 2008 presidential candidates are backed by the money of David Rockefeller in one way or another, and that money is being spent for the purpose of pushing forward the agenda for One World Government, which will greatly benefit international corporations.

All of these candidates are members of David Rockefeller's Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which advocates One World Government –

Fred Thompson (also a member of the pro-war American Enterprise Institute)
Rudy Giuliani
John McCain
Mitt Romney
Jim Gilmore
Newt Gingrich
Hillary Clinton
Barack Obama
John Edwards
Joe Biden
Chris Dodd
Bill Richardson

]]> By: Kyle Bennett http://freetheanimal.com/2007/06/im_just_sayin.html#comment-4668 Kyle Bennett Sat, 16 Jun 2007 13:14:48 +0000 http://localhost/animal/2007/06/im_just_sayin.html#comment-4668 <p>I still prefer Thompson over any of the others. It seems that his big thing is federalism, in that he makes the right noises in that direction, and what I know of his record supports it. That is the single most important sturctural issue in national politics now (and actual issues of content are moot, so what else is there?) Still, it's not like I buy it enough to actually demean myself into a voting booth or anything. And I'm certainly not going to actually *hope* for anything to come of it. </p> <p>Besides, he's the favorite to win, in my estimation, so I might as well look for something positive in it. Cynicism aside, I think there is a non-zero chance that he could make as big a difference as Reagan did. Just barely non-zero.</p> I still prefer Thompson over any of the others. It seems that his big thing is federalism, in that he makes the right noises in that direction, and what I know of his record supports it. That is the single most important sturctural issue in national politics now (and actual issues of content are moot, so what else is there?) Still, it's not like I buy it enough to actually demean myself into a voting booth or anything. And I'm certainly not going to actually *hope* for anything to come of it.

Besides, he's the favorite to win, in my estimation, so I might as well look for something positive in it. Cynicism aside, I think there is a non-zero chance that he could make as big a difference as Reagan did. Just barely non-zero.

]]>