Hey, if it’s good enough for GW…

...Uh, George Will, that is. About those polls critical of the president's "handling" of gas prices, who over the age of 7 really thinks presidents can "handle" world petroleum prices? You know, it's not like I'm unaware that most of my posts on this blog ooze an arrogance that goes so far as to imply that most people--including most who read this blog--are to be considered utter and complete ignoramuses and morons when it comes to understanding anything important about this world, its history, its politics, its ethics, and its economic realities and how they all integrate together. Well, at least I'm not alone. When guys as polite and well-spoken as George Will start getting uppity, perhaps its time to start asking some serious questions about what in the hell is going on. (link: Beck, who's addressing a different aspect of the thing)


This is a preview. The complete post is for Monthly, Quarterly, Annual, and Lifetime Members. Login or Join at the level you choose. Member posts sometimes go out in complete form to non-members on the email list, so subscribe. Browse the free downloads. New ones are added regularly.

LoginJoinEmailDownloads
Read More

Integrated History

Billy Beck strikes a nerve with something. The underlying elements of this is something I was just pondering the other day. In fact, a lot of this goes a long way to answering my question below. In a time when people are not learning to think, episodes like The Great Island Paradise of Gas Experiment are the routine order of the day. There are no principles to refer to, and what good would they be, anyway? Just make sure everybody gets the right to vote. That's really important. It doesn't matter that they're stone imbeciles. Generally, I was wondering how it is that people think the way they do. Specifically, I concluded that it was because, like I, they were taught from the moment of birth to submit to some authority or the other at all times and without question. Of course, that's appropriate for infants and small children. I'm aware that there are many who go to great lengths to push their children into independent problem solving, but that's not the same. How about: what problem? Why does it exist? And who says it's a problem, anyway, why do they say it, and why is it of any importance...


This is a preview. The complete post is for Monthly, Quarterly, Annual, and Lifetime Members. Login or Join at the level you choose. Member posts sometimes go out in complete form to non-members on the email list, so subscribe. Browse the free downloads. New ones are added regularly.

LoginJoinEmailDownloads
Read More

On Natual Rights

Well, I disagree with the basic premise of this article, which says that "property" is a natural law. Show me a neanderthal with a deed to a cave, and then we can disect the rest of this article. KellyE That was a comment on this post, left over at BlogExplosion. I replied, "Well, KellyE, I'm sure a Neanderthal would be happy to show you the "deed" to his cave. It'd probably take the form of a club or a spear." But he (or she) persists: Nice try at distraction! The concept of 'property' (or ownership) is not natural law. Just more asserting of the same. Scanning his (or her) blog, I get the sense of a degree of materialism which is good, i.e., I'm a materialist, too, but not to the point of denying the plain nature of things. I go on to reply: "You seem confused. In your first comment, you suggest that a "deed" (a man-made legal construction) is necessary for property to be a natural right. Then you simply go on to assert that it's not. [...] Ownership, i.e., property, is an inviolable corollary consequence of a natural right to one's life, the one and only natural...


This is a preview. The complete post is for Monthly, Quarterly, Annual, and Lifetime Members. Login or Join at the level you choose. Member posts sometimes go out in complete form to non-members on the email list, so subscribe. Browse the free downloads. New ones are added regularly.

LoginJoinEmailDownloads
Read More

“Illegal Recreation”

In spite of thinking that the immigration debate is one of the most profound issues we've seen in a while (I'll have more to say), I just had to burst out laughing when I saw this from John T. Kennedy. This isn’t about recreation folks: It’s about illegal recreation! Well, IT'S THE LAW, you know. So let me hear no complaints concerning the threat of going to jail for 10 years and being tagged a felon for life because you (or perhaps a child or houseguest) played poker online from your computer in Washington state. You guys and gals traveling there on vacation or business had better find out whether it covers only state residents as defined by state law, or whether it covers anyone within the geographical jurisdiction of the state, including airspace and Washington's numerous waterways and inlets. Just another day in this here "Land of the Free."


This is a preview. The complete post is for Monthly, Quarterly, Annual, and Lifetime Members. Login or Join at the level you choose. Member posts sometimes go out in complete form to non-members on the email list, so subscribe. Browse the free downloads. New ones are added regularly.

LoginJoinEmailDownloads
Read More

In the Company of Fools

By this measure alone (the responses from obvious "conservatives," not the interview transcript), America as a political experiment is lost. Dead. It really started out going that way not too long after the ink had dried on the Declaration of Independence. We've come full circle. We're Europe, again, and there's essentially nothing much that differentiates us anymore. The only thing left for unequivocally enlightened individualists to hang their hats on is the ideals of the Enlightenment. America was the political culmination of those ideals, now gone, leaving only the ideas to be preserved by the very best of humanity. The ideas will never die. The Enlightenment shall live on--the ideas just as true and powerful as always. But far from the luxury of there being only the few who non-contradictorily understand and hold such ideas, there are fewer and fewer who are even made aware of them during their entire spans of life. And even those so informed reject them because they've been instructed from birth that they're no more important than any other ant on the hill or bee in the hive. They learn humility before "authority" above all--at the expense of their happiness; at the expense of their...


This is a preview. The complete post is for Monthly, Quarterly, Annual, and Lifetime Members. Login or Join at the level you choose. Member posts sometimes go out in complete form to non-members on the email list, so subscribe. Browse the free downloads. New ones are added regularly.

LoginJoinEmailDownloads
Read More

Deny Women the Vote!

Now, before you get your panties all in a bunch, keep reading. It may not be entirely what you think. John T. Kennedy found something. Just because I like it so damn much, I'm posting the whole thing here. It's not very long. Indulge yourself in some classical liberalism for five minutes. Against Woman Suffrage by Lysander Spooner New Age, February 24, 1877 Women are human beings, and consequently have all the natural rights that any human beings can have. They have just as good a right to make laws as men have, and no better; AND THAT IS JUST NO RIGHT AT ALL. No human being, nor any number of human beings, have any right to make laws, and compel other human beings to obey them. To say that they have is to say that they are the masters and owners of those of whom they require such obedience. The only law that any human being can rightfully be compelled to obey is simply the law of justice. And justice is not a thing that is made, or that can be unmade, or altered, by any human authority. It is a natural principle, inhering in the very nature of...


This is a preview. The complete post is for Monthly, Quarterly, Annual, and Lifetime Members. Login or Join at the level you choose. Member posts sometimes go out in complete form to non-members on the email list, so subscribe. Browse the free downloads. New ones are added regularly.

LoginJoinEmailDownloads
Read More

Suffering Fools

I'm woefully behind in my reading so I don't know what's being said on other bogs about this Moussaoui deal. Nor am I terribly informed about the case. I find a lot of things troubling. The guy was in jail on September 11, yet he has been prosecuted--with everything the feds could throw at it--in an effort to invoke capital punishment for, near as I can determine: the crime of not telling the state about an impending crime and incriminating himself in the process. Now, I'm certain that someone will come forth with a comment bearing some "legal twist" that makes the plain reality of the thing look like something other than it is. Be my guest. I'll say right now that if a surviving 9/11 family member did away with the guy, I wouldn't really care a wit about it. But I deplore the notion that anyone at any time has any obligation to tell the state anything--anything. Because: once that box it opened, it is not as far a stretch as you may think to the point of obligation to tell the state everything. The state has no moral rights whatsoever. Let me repeat that: the state has...


This is a preview. The complete post is for Monthly, Quarterly, Annual, and Lifetime Members. Login or Join at the level you choose. Member posts sometimes go out in complete form to non-members on the email list, so subscribe. Browse the free downloads. New ones are added regularly.

LoginJoinEmailDownloads
Read More

262 Million Dead

As much as I cherish the Americans all over the world who'd love to come here, and those who've already risked life & limb to get here, May Day simply is not the proper forum in which to commemorate this struggle. As I alerted you way back on May 1, 2004, May Day ought to be about commemorating the millions dead at the hands of totalitarian regimes operating under the dishonest, manipulative, fallacious banner of "worker's rights." Somehow I forgot to bring you Catallarchy's 2005 remembrance. And now it's 2006 already. I really can't admonish you enough to take the time to go and read the articles that make up each of these yearly remembrances. Most people, today, have a pretty decent general knowledge of the atrocities carried out by Hitler. As awful as they were, they pale in comparison to the atrocities carried out under the regimes of the USSR and Chinese communists that account for well over 100 million people exterminated. It has long raised the question for me: is it that innocent people were killed without provocation, or the reason they were killed? The Jews were killed out of racist hatred and envy. The reality of that...


This is a preview. The complete post is for Monthly, Quarterly, Annual, and Lifetime Members. Login or Join at the level you choose. Member posts sometimes go out in complete form to non-members on the email list, so subscribe. Browse the free downloads. New ones are added regularly.

LoginJoinEmailDownloads
Read More