Peacemakers

Let me be clear: I am neither amoral nor relativistic when it comes to war and the moral issues surrounding it (that’s well documented here). Thus, I don’t look at the following in a particularly cognitive manner, which is to say that it’s kind of like listening to a piece of music composed expressly for the purpose of evoking human emotion at a level of depth that motivates contemplation and reflection — reflection on the value of what it ideally means to be a human being. I could pick at this, here and there, but that would miss the point.


WHAT IT'S ABOUT AND HOW IT WORKS

Free The Animal is an eclectic writing project about everything since November 2003. 23 years, 5,500 posts, 5 million words.

It's a paid membership blog. Most posts are free and public, but only paid members can comment. What determines whether it's free or paid is when I publish. Monday through Friday, free and public. Saturday and Sunday, for paid members. That's it. Membership info here.

2 Comments

  1. Richard Nikoley on June 26, 2007 at 16:18

    I've personally always found it pointless to wring hands over mass nuclear destruction. In the wide scheme of things, I figure it's about likely as a planet killer asteroid and I don't worry about those either.

    On the other hand, it does serve to be sober-minded about smaller scale use of such weapons.



  2. John Sabotta on June 26, 2007 at 15:48

    Some years ago, I was watching ATOMIC CAFE with S. and when the animated informational cartoons showing massive nuclear exchanges came on I said, regretfully – "Why couldn't everything have ended this way, instead of the way it is ending. It's so beautiful!"

    And S. turned to me and said – "Don't worry. There's still time."