They Lined Up in Pink for the Woman Who Strangled Her Babies

That was the watershed. Not Roe. Not “my body.” The day millions of women decided a born child was fair game, and the killer was her sister.

Men say no.

At least there was 1 man on that jury. He may have saved a lot. I don’t know. We do know that if a criminal black man is presumed to be mistreated, there will be riots in the streets. Historical record. If three young children are strangled to death, one-by-one, by their own mother, there will be cheering in the streets.

Wrap your minds. If you can. I cannot.

…I think back to when I was a kid in the 60s and 70s and abortion was a big thing, and then I was actually watching TV in ’73 at 12 yrs old when the screen popped with that Roe vs. Wade decision.

I didn’t understand much about it, and really never cared much about it, even into adulthood. For a long time I was supportive of it.

We were talking about the difference between a fetus and when human life begins. We were all on the same page about human life, only differing on the line.

Fast forward. That “slippery slope” slid all the way down.

Now, millions of women want and cheer killing real live children.

They do. It is in reality now. Even an Oprah special where the big news was that black momma murderers aren’t getting enough support. So there is racism now supporting women who murder their children.

You can’t shake your head enough.

So where does all this leave us as a civilization and a society composed of roughly equal numbers of men and women?

This movement has been building for more than a century—at least since women’s suffrage, beginning around 1919. A lot of people warned that it was a slippery slope. And yes, I know: “slippery slope” is usually dismissed as an invalid argument. Well, look where we are now.

Women cheering other women. Women cheering mothers who murder their own babies because they had a bad day.

Everyone needs to reflect on this—deeply and seriously—because I think it’s particularly characteristic of America. It may exist in Western Europe as well, but it’s certainly a feature of white Western culture that things have gone this far.

I live in Thailand, and there’s nothing like that here. Babies are doted on. If a woman ever did anything truly bad—especially something as brutal as murdering her children—she would immediately be held accountable. There would be no questions and no excuses.

There’s nothing like this in Asian culture because Asian culture simply isn’t feminist in the Western sense. Yes, girls have their say. They’re autonomous and respected. But there is nothing resembling this feminism, which has become a complete cancer in Western culture. A complete cancer.

Now we have to talk about the practicalities. This is out in the open. What should people do? What should men do? What should fathers do? What should grandmothers and grandfathers do?

If a woman with children expresses any sort of support for this kind of act, you have to seriously consider whether your children or grandchildren might be in grave danger. You may need to take legal steps immediately.

There have already been cases of women murdering their own children in support of this ideology—the Lindsay Clancy case, for example. And I believe there are several others.

Imagine being so enamored of this movement that you go out and kill your own babies in support of it.

I really don’t know what more to say. The facts are all out there. This isn’t an issue where we’re disputing or discussing evidence and facts. We have an admitted murderer of three children, and we have the spectacle of millions of women supporting her—devastated that her trial didn’t end in an acquittal, but in a hung jury, thanks to one single black man.

It’s something that’s very difficult to wrap your mind around, because I think most of us grew up believing that this is not how society—and certainly not family life—functions. Sure, there have always been real tragedies and terrible things happening throughout human history, but they were isolated events. Maybe a mother kills her children and herself, or a father kills his children and wife before killing himself. That’s happened from time to time. We know some of the stories.

What we’ve never had before is millions of women coming out to support a woman who did this, donating more than a million dollars to her legal defense, and then crying in the streets because the jury didn’t return an acquittal—but a hung jury, again thanks to that one black man.

The other two males on the jury—whom I called “MINO”: males in name only—were no better. I couldn’t even stomach watching the interview with one of them. He was a total chick—a total beta-boy pussy

So, man, what else can I say?


WHAT IT'S ABOUT AND HOW IT WORKS

Free The Animal is an eclectic writing project about everything since November 2003. 23 years, 5,500 posts, 5 million words.

It's a paid membership blog. Most posts are free and public, but only paid members can comment. What determines whether it's free or paid is when I publish. Monday through Friday, free and public. Saturday and Sunday, for paid members. That's it. Membership info here.

7 Comments

  1. Andrew Austin on September 16, 2026 at 09:03

    Completely fucking nauseating. No wonder a large number of western men are losing interest in western women. Who would want a cunt that supports a women murdering her own babies? Apologies to the western women who are equally disgusted. They should be shouting their disgust from the rooftops.

    • Georgene on September 16, 2026 at 09:29

      I am and I have. I can’t even imagine doing this but I also can’t imagine murdering a baby while still in the womb either.

  2. Alan Andersen on September 16, 2026 at 11:22

    The very fact that the Clancy jury had both men and women on it, is a travesty and failure was baked in. No self-respecting man, or woman, should engage in a death-related judicial squabble with those of the opposite sex. And because the man’s role includes the reality of war, killing, and corporal punishment; they do the hard things that must be done, often dying from it. Men exist often to do unmentionable things so that the women can be spared from that and harbor the view, if they so choose, that anyone is redeemable with the proper help. And yes, this means that women in a civilized society should be spared from the duties of a judge or jury that deals out vicious sentences.

    Thus, if a woman spends time looking at her exercise bands and figuring out how to use them to kill her children, picking them up and testing them, planning how best to approach and subdue, which child to take first, then hold firm while she squeezes the life out of her child, squeezing tighter and tighter as her child goes through his death agonies, and then does it AGAIN, and AGAIN, then the men must do the hard thing with her. Women can work on social relief programs to get help to troubled mothers, but always knowing that if one of them should happen to murder her own children, her fate will be settled by men.

    • Richard Nikoley on September 16, 2026 at 11:39

      Perfect. Women should be spared the toughness of making the tough decisions on public policy in the voting booth, too.

  3. William L. Wilson, MD on September 16, 2026 at 21:32

    This case is indeed very sad and hard to even comprehend. She killed her kids, so she needs to pay a price–period. Perhaps she even had a bit of CARB syndrome to screw up her thinking: https://carbsyndrome.com

  4. F Jeff Puhek on September 16, 2026 at 22:10

    She not only killed her kids, she failed at suicide, leaving herself paralyzed. Boo-hoo, that’s not any reason to acquit her from being convicted of murder.

  5. Tim R on September 17, 2026 at 09:10

    In a sane world, the murderer would be relieved of her life by local men, and any who supported her should be sterilized and have their children taken away. It’s so simple.

Leave a Comment