Thrilled, Really. After many Paleo sites lost half their Alexa Oomph around June of 2012 (I went from 80-90K world to ~160-180K, Sisson, 3K to 6K, Wolf 30K to 60K, etc), I’ve been scratching my way back. Owing to my recent blogging marathon and resistant starch attention in general, now back at 90K world, 18K US. The scoring is like golf. Lower is better.
The other funny thing is that if you look at ‘who visits FTA’, its substantially underrepresented by men, and even more substantially OVERrepresented by women, based on Internet averages. Hugely underrepresented by those with no college and enormously OVERrepresented by those with college degrees, though underrepresented by those with graduate degrees, which I take to mean graduate school makes you even dumber.
77% of visitors are US, and Canada, UK and India round out most of the remainder.
The Cunt Master :)
This realization promoted me to begin drafting a post yesterday that I didn’t finish and will probably shitcan. The point of it was that I had an interesting experience after my James Altucher-style post on Anarchy. By style, I mean mostly 1-sentence paragraphs. I got a ton of shit over it in email, 1st time “get some help” comments in the mod queue that got deleted without ever seeing light of day, and even some lying bullshit from an ignorant in comments.
I also got a few kudos. But here’s the deal: 100% of the shit was from pussies with male genitals, and 90% of the kudos were from real women. So I ask myself: Are real women starving for real men? Like the kind who never, ever tell her what they calculate she wants to hear? I suspect women are so viciously smart on that score that they detect our disingenuous sweet-nothing lies by like the 3rd word out of our mouths.
Trying to please women is a double edged sword. We should try and no real man wouldn’t. Veritable spice of life. But I think being absolutely true to yourself in word and deed is a sure winner every time, and all it takes is a real woman (just add water). It’s what women crave.
With that out of the way, here’s a ruthlessly dead-on post about Real Men and how Hanna Rosin is just living in her own private Idaho.
Let’s get Hanna’s motivations clear right from the get-go, shall we? Hanna Rosin is not interested in equality. She is interested in dominance. Female dominance. Nothing more, and nothing less. From the author’s own website:
I come from a long line of matriarchs, women who either ruled over their husbands, or ran away from them. My mother is an intimidating figure. She has always served as the neighborhood watchdog, taking on bullies and running the co-op board with an iron fist. If you met her, it would be obvious why I was open to possibility of female dominance, because she embodied it long before it became the defining trend of our era.
Hanna acknowledges that female dominance is a central part of her understanding of how the world works, and that female dominance has become the defining trend of our era. Well, kudos to Hanna for at least being honest.
Hanna has been on a crusade to prove female dominance for some time now. In her original article, published at the Atlantic, she mused that “[f]or years, women’s progress has been cast as a struggle for equality. But what if equality isn’t the end point? What if modern, postindustrial society is simply better suited to women?”.
What if female dominance is inevitable?
Her recent article at Time Magazine lays out five reasons men are slated to be the oppressed sex – five ways in which men are complete and utter failures:
Men are failing in the workplace
The traditional household is vanishing
Men are increasingly subjected to violence from female partners
Working and middle-class fathers have become non-existent
Men have become feminized
Let’s take these one by one.
Men are failing in the workplace?
And what workplace would that be? The one that keeps our infrastructure up and running?
Statistically speaking, 100% of power plant operators, distributors and dispatchers are men.
- 91% of the nation’s electrical engineers are men.
- 97.6% of electrical power line installers and maintenance workers are men.
- 95.5% of water and liquid waste treatment plant and system operators are men.
- 95.9% of aircraft pilots and flight engineers are men.
- 98.4% of aircraft mechanics and service technicians are men.
- 91.9% of computer network architects, who design and implement all our computer based communications systems are men.
- 94.2% of radio and telecommunications equipment installers and repair technicians are men.
- 93.4% of garbage collectors are men.
- 78.2% of all workers in production, transportation and material moving occupations are men
- 82.4% of all industrial production managers are men
- 97.5% of all extraction workers, providing the raw materials to run our economy are men
Transportation, energy, communications, water treatment, resource extraction and waste management. Those are the things that provide us with a little something called civilization as we know it, and they are overwhelmingly provided by men.
While it is true that the manufacturing sector has taken a hit in recent years, the United States remains the world’s largest manufacturer, with a 2009 industrial output of $2.33 trillion. Its manufacturing output is greater than Germany, France, India and Brazil combined.
- 70% of that total workforce is male.
- Primary metals manufacturing? 85.6% men.
- Apparel manufacturing? 68.3% women.
So ladies in manufacturing are basically just sewing clothes?
How shocking! How surprising! How very housewifely!
What are the ladies doing in the workforce anyways? Most common job categories for women in 2010?
- Secretaries (96.8% women)
- Nurses (92% women)
- Primary and elementary school teachers (81.9% women)
- Cashiers (74.4% women)
- Nursing aides (88.5% women)
- Retail sales (51.9% women)
- Retail sales managers (44.1% women)
- Waitresses (71.6% women)
- Maids (89.9% women)
Oh ladies. Thunderous applause. Doing all the same work in the paid market that you used to do at home. Progress!
Well, maybe the future will be different!
The top ten industries by annual average employment growth between 2Q09 and 2Q13:
- Information Services
- Support Activities for Mining
- Educational Support Services
- Technical and Trades Schools
- Oil and Gas Extraction
- Computer Systems Design
- Management and Technical Consulting Services
- Other Schools and Instruction
- Ambulatory Healthcare Services
- Employment Services
Educational support services? Maybe. Ambulatory healthcare and employment services? Okay. Sure. Women will dominate! But IT? Computer systems design? Mining support? Oil and gas extraction?
Hanna Rosin, you are full of shit. Women aren’t excelling in the workplace. They are doing all the same housewifely jobs they’ve always done. [emphasis added by editorial license]
The traditional household is failing?
Gee, I wonder why? Women are out in the workforce doing their housewife gig, neglecting their children and partners and are deeply, deeply unhappy as a result.
But let’s blame men for that, shall we, Hanna? What women need is to be more dominant. To rule with an iron fist. Oh, except that women in traditional marriages are much happier.
Men are increasingly subject to violence from female partners?
It’s just sickening that Hanna sees this as a good thing. There is no question that it’s true, but how on earth can it ever be a net positive? Hanna links violence to women’s sexual confidence, which is deeply disturbing in and of itself.
Women are becoming more sexually confident, and something Camille Paglia has been waiting for, more aggressive and violent in both good ways and bad.
What Hanna is not taking into account is that women get away with hitting partners because the men are taking it. For now. How long does she expect that state of affairs to last?
Suzanne Venker puts it nicely:
It is a dangerous thing to create a society of angry men. Feminists have no idea what a can of worms they’ve created — and what it’s about to do to our nation.
Working and middle class fathers are becoming non-existent?
Again, it’s just sickening that Hanna thinks millions of children being raised without fathers is proof that women are dominant and men are obsolete. Children raised by single mothers do poorly on every imaginable scale. They have more emotional problems, experience more stress, are more likely to grow up poor, they have lower educational achievements and experience way more behavioral problems than children who grow up with married parents. Depression, suicide, drug abuse, jail and psychiatric medications are all more common in populations of children raised by single mothers.
The absence of fathers from the home is proof that women are stupid, heartless and profoundly unconcerned with their children’s well-being. If that’s dominance, I’ll pass, thanks.
Men are becoming feminized?
- 64% of men do not wear any fragrance of any kind. Only 23% of men wear cologne daily. And cologne is hardly some arty-farty invention of middle class ladies.
- 80% of household spending is controlled by women. That 20% leftover is being used by men to “feminize” themselves? Bullshit.
- Summer dresses
- Concert tickets
- Little black dress
- Beauty products
- Apple Gadgets
- Televisions and A/V equipment
- Dates and relationships
- Life experiences
It’s interesting that the lady list has only two things that could ostensibly be shared with a partner (concert tickets, chocolates), while the men’s list contains almost ALL shareable items. The preference for gambling, cars and sports doesn’t suggest the sissification of men to me.
Keep dreaming, Hanna. Men are becoming the gentle kittens you would like them to be? Don’t be fooled. Just because men can be and are very often gentle, kind and giving to women doesn’t mean they will always be that way.
Here’s an idea for you: let’s claim that men are obsolete and worthless, like a map of a flat earth or a woolly mammoth snare, completely ignore the fact that they run the entire economy and make possible every service industry by doing the hard, shitty work, slap the shit out of them at home, take their children from them and then call them sissies.
How long do you think it will take before you discover that men are not only far from obsolete, they are faster, bigger, smarter and stronger than you?
How long will it take before they decide they have had quite enough of your shit? [emphasis added; male editorial license]
How long, Hanna, can you live without water, power, communications, transportation or sewage treatment?
I don’t think so.
Obviously people want social calm, but if you do not let clever and ingenious people participate, there must be some dormant volcano that will erupt, sooner or later.
Hanna and her ilk think the revolution will be the triumph of feminism and the utter domination of women.
I wouldn’t count on it.
Not for one second.
Lots of love,
Now go give that JBitch the kisses she deserves, in comments. I wanted to get this post out yesterday, but it has taken a whole day to keep a straight face and hold my laughter sufficiently to type.
I adore women. Real women. Without them, none of the male achievements above would have ever happened and I don’t mean that biologically. Look at virtually anything and everything we guys do in life and if you scratch deeply enough, and in spite of any words, you will find a woman down there, somewhere.