Yes, But…

That’s what I keep hearing in the eminent domain matter. "Yes, but the state’s not taking the property, they’re paying market value for it."

Yea, right, tell that to Kelo and her co-plaintiffs in the New London case that went all the way to the Supremes. In addition to receiving only year 2000 market value as payment for their homes, the city will also offset that amount by 5 years of back rent they claim is owed for the period of time from the original eminent domain action all while the case was working its way through the state’s own marvelously efficient court and legal system. If the owners had rented their homes out during that time, the city is seeking to take all of that money, too. In many cases, owners will get zero for their homes and will be pursued for additional claims by the city.

Here’s a good writeup on the matter by McQ. One owner will end up "owing" over $300,000, and the lead plaintiff, Kelo, will "owe" $57,000.

This is what happens when you take on the state, especially when you’re right and everyone knows it, making them look so awful. I mean, would you not just hate to be the children of one of these New London creatures? Imagine having to live with such monstrous humanoids for parents?

I won’t be surprised if actual violence befalls any of the city officials involved. It’s amazing to me that such risk apparently wasn’t enough to deter them from this latest outrage. Well, I suppose they weighed that possibility against the benefit of probably never again seeing a real challenge mounted to the use of eminent domain.

The message is clear: challenge the state peacefully, and if you lose, in the state’s own court system, you will sorely regret your rebellion. And if we can manage it, you will lose everything you’ve ever worked for in your life.

Just shut up and be Good Germans, all of you.

Update: Kyle Bennett reminds us of Carl Drega, below. Ever heard of him? Do you know the whole story?

Since Covid killed my Cabo San Lucas vacation-rental business in 2021, this is my day job. I can't do it without you. Memberships are $10 monthly, $20 quarterly, or $65 annually. Two premium coffees per month. Every membership helps finance this work I do, and if you like what I do, please chip in. No grandiose pitches.


  1. gary on August 22, 2005 at 18:20

    And we want Iraq to model themselves after us? May as well bring Saddam back. He wouldn't have had any problem at all with shooting someone and charging them for the bullet, which is what this looks like.

  2. Polanco Consulting on August 22, 2005 at 20:14

    There is no way to make this law right. Taking people's property for any reason is, I believe, more widely known as STEALING, no matter how you justify it.

  3. Kyle Bennett on August 23, 2005 at 06:34

    I see another Carl Drega coming.

  4. Walter E. Wallis on August 23, 2005 at 07:52

    They took a gas station for the new arena in San Jose. When the owner received only $20,000 for his property he was told that he was lucky to get anything since the cost of cleaning up leakage was more than the property was worth.

  5. Kaitlyn on August 23, 2005 at 10:33

    I love you site. The Design is wonderful. I'll be coming back.

  6. Christopher Trottier on August 23, 2005 at 21:27

    The simple fact is that there is no such thing as a get rich quick scheme.

  7. Sunni Maravillosa on August 30, 2005 at 10:19

    Vin Suprynowicz wrote a book titled The Ballad of Carl Drega a few years ago. It covers Drega's story, plus much more.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.