The Ghost of Spiro Agnew: “Love It Or Leave It” Is a Stupid Bromide and People Should Know Better
In comments yesterday, Spiro Agnew rose from the grave again,
just as he’s been doing several times per day since 1996.
“America, love it or leave
it.”
I’ve never, ever met a single
non-anarchist in 20 years who had the faintest idea where that
bromide originated. Yep: that shitbag, bribe taking USVP to the
shitbag USP, aka Dick “and not in a good way”
Nixon.
I deleted the comment. Two reasons. 1) It
was submitted by a moron wanker well known to me for his moron and
his wanking right out in public. 2) I just don’t entertain woefully
stupid in my comments, anymore; and I’m tired of getting wrapped up
in futile attempts at fixing same.
This
“argument,” always stated Just So, is a
frequent one anywhere and anytime someone complains about
State-backed force and coercion—especially in “The Land of the Free.” Unbeknownst to
its ignorant purveyors, it’s completely incoherent, illogical,
inconsistent, bankrupt and stupid.
I’m in a good
mood—we’re going to see George Lopez
put on a show at Mountain Winery, tonight—so I’ll take a moment to
explain. I want to help. It would be better if you didn’t walk
around making yourself look stupid so easily.
Not necessarily in any
order of importance:
- Though stated
as though you do, you don’t really own the
place; as such, you have zero standing to make
such an admonition or demand of anyone. America, much less planet
earth, is actually not your living room or
backyard during a party that’s gotten out of hand. - Nobody died and left you King.
- It’s
incoherent. It’s offered in opposition to an argument or example of
why force is wrong; it doesn’t address that argument in the
slightest. It’s non sequitur. - It’s illogical.
If State force is a good thing, presumably so long as “checked by
democracy” (see: “Land of the Free“), then make
that argument. - It’s
illogical. It actually emphasizes the nature of the problem at
hand, and to such an extent that its purveyors are perfectly
willing to stand in for any old common thug and tell you how and
where to move your ass. - It’s inconsistent.
Offered as a lame bromide to argue for the democratic status quo,
it does the opposite by tossing democracy out, appointing one’s
self as dictator in opposition to anyone who disagrees and is
trying to persuade—or shame—the voters who democratically elect the
representatives. - It’s inconsistent. It
presumes the premise: “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”
America—also often stated as “Life, Liberty, and Property.” But a
human life requires values (food, shelter, etc.). And that premise
was never meant to imply that someone had to provide
those values to anyone, but that anyone and everyone had
a natural right to seek them out through discovery or trade, and
when secured, direct their disposition. “LEAVE” means: leave
everything. - It’s bankrupt. Not one single
human animal has ever chosen the time or place of their birth.
Animals—and all animals do—seek to survive…and humans
additionally seek prosperity and
happiness—NATURALLY. And because humans are
social animals, they develop social assets beginning from the
moment a random uncle plucks their cheek (and today, uncles get
texts—I do). They build social assets throughout life in terms of
family, friends, acquaintances, networking partners, business
associates. The value of such assets typically dwarf everything
material. “LEAVE IT.” - America—indeed every
country on earth—is by no means, whatsoever, a free country. If you really believe
that, then I really have no time for you. I don’t do stupid—nor do
I care about fixing it beyond writing blogs. The argument is about
freedom; or, to put it another way, demolishing the Zoo
Human. Various Zoo Human cell blocks may be relatively
better than others, but merely admonishing to “just leave and move
to another one” simply exposes a failure to grasp anything but
one’s own impotence—one’s comfort as a Zoo Humanoid, happy to be
fed & sheltered at the expense of others. - It’s an admission. “Love it or leave it.” “It is what it
is.” “Don’t worry, be happy,”—or, just leave…because you’re
crashing my pawnish, content, ignorantly blissful bone.
OK. It’s just really, really fucking stupid.
I’m glad I’ve never uttered it in my life and have always been
embarrassed for those who did in decent company. So, now:
If you ever did, don’t apologize, just don’t do it again. And if
you do it in the future, then you have no excuse for your obvious
display of stupidity.
Please consider being
so guided in life.
WHAT IT'S ABOUT AND HOW IT WORKS
Free The Animal is an eclectic writing project about everything since November 2003. 23 years, 5,500 posts, 5 million words.
It's a paid membership blog. Most posts are free and public, but only paid members can comment. What determines whether it's free or paid is when I publish. Monday through Friday, free and public. Saturday and Sunday, for paid members. That's it. Membership info here.
Nope. I’m too focused on walking up steep slopes to open my mouth.
Feeling a bit bloody-minded there, daor croí?
A ‘hey there’ in style:
Just remember that Charles is a high profile Carbsane defector. In these dark times that matters. You know, the old “enemy of my enemy” thing…
Any philosophy/ideology etc. means nothing until it is explained in terms of physical phenomena. Under this framework, all views of the world reduce to two simple truths: (1) you can do whatever you want. (2) Just remember, so can everyone else.
ELMM
FWIW, I have never harbored the illusion for even a second that you have the slightest clue as to what Im about, what my values are and how I wield them.
Doogie
That’s right and that’s why anarchism is the only political viewpoint that’s always logically consistent and whole.
I’m surprised he didn’t tell you to move to Somalia, that’s one I hear pretty often.
Hey there, Ataraxia, ain’t ya gonna leap to the defence of Spiros Anagnostopoulos ?
Κυρία
Hmmm, my Tranquillity is unter meer or even Gone to the Moon.
Daor is expensive, á la Francais trop cher, while dílis croí means sweet heart.
Sammy just maybe has it sussed:
“Or are you not seein things too clear?
Are you too much in love to hear?
Is it all goin in one ear and out the other?”
Sláinte
And the basket case really was AnAgnos . . .
Whereas lovely boyish Malcolm McDowell, was accompanied by
youtube.com/watch?v=AZKT2ZOA5NY
Sláinte
Or Jonathan King may have it sussed : “Everyone’s gone to the moon”.
May you soon recover your αταραξία, καρδιά μου (and thank you for the lesson, ladies like to learn).
Yes. Angelic thugs and dystopian governments.
You’ve put into words a sentiment that I’ve held for quite a while now. No reasonable person will respond to an objection to violence with: “Government – it’s our way, or fuck off of the planet earth.” And then you get an offer to move to Somalia (a place that has been backward for centuries by government, and whose neighbors are even worse off). Yeah, lets look at an African stateless region and neglect Mugabe-style tin-pot dictators abound. /s
these are very lucid & logical.
but i also remember dear Sean said something similar (“love it or leave it”) to the lovely wooo once. XD
cheers,
ps. “moron wanker” ? XD
Dear Christ guys:
Every dog-owner says this when puppy training.
In more genteel times, Dubliners often referred to an opponent as ‘piece a’ dog’s vomit’.
Eat it!
Sláinte
LeonRover,
Oh my, one good turn deserves another :
“I live in the light of the bright silver moon
I’ll take you off sailing from midnight till noon
I’ll show you the Sea of Tranquility
You can have any flavor you happen to see”
Ataraxia of Epicurus…. wherein the epicurean delights of anarchy and agnosticism lead to tranquility.
The real doozy is that it’s likely that the same people who scoff at us free-marketeers calling for people in the marketplace to choose alternative products or services instead of calling for government regulation, are the ones likely using the ‘love it or leave it’ statement. The inconsistency and douchebaggery is too much to tolerate.
Epicuria,
J o’ King – only the Title – Ah prefers Beastings.
youtube.com/watch?v=zhaZ3cRCKgk
Sláinte
Gordon but not Gheko, but:
“And little dark holes where the varmints hang out”
I praise him for the tune, which is clearly of Irish/Scottish/English origin transmuted to New Scotland – I could have sung this myself when I occasionally pub-sang.
And who could forget his Edmund Fitzgerald? (Not I, said the Sparrow.)
Just a point: the original Gnostics boasted of secret Gnosis, so Agnostics were agin them & for empirical open Gnosis. (Bring ‘ome t’ Bacon, Lass.)
Sláinte