New Hypothesis: Non-Feminst Women are 90%+ >5s (…there’s an antiHypothesis)
Couldn’t resist.
Check this out. Here’s the comment I just posted to my personal Facebook and The Daily Fucktard Page.
That tears it.
Predominately, feminists are < 5s; Real Women > 5s. Perhaps the essential underlying integration. Just look here at the ENORMOUS mind/body desirability, guys. Literally a smorgasbord for every taste.
We have zero to worry about: Real Men and Women; you who understand the simple fucking distinction between genders—something 3-year-olds get, already. Perhaps this, above all, signals that feminism is simply best ignored. Consider this: It literally persists because of its essential Fucktarded nature. When something is so fucking moron as to make a huge slice of the population laf, there’s a chance it’ll stick around just on the merit of ridiculous.
Amazing what being female and ugly can do to a mind when they let their resentment get to them and want to blame someone terresrial rather than doG.
Here’s my two favs. Everyone has their tastes and favorites, these are merely mine and I have no beef with yours.
#1 According to Richard
A quirky #2
…OK, here’s #3:
Awesome
Alright, Bea’s probably gonna be pissed. I’ll simply remind her that we have to see every Brad Pitt film for a reason.
WHAT IT'S ABOUT AND HOW IT WORKS
Free The Animal is an eclectic writing project about everything since November 2003. 23 years, 5,500 posts, 5 million words.
It's a paid membership blog. Most posts are free and public, but only paid members can comment. What determines whether it's free or paid is when I publish. Monday through Friday, free and public. Saturday and Sunday, for paid members. That's it. Membership info here.
I think if these “new wave” feminists actually cared about equality under the law, there wouldn’t be any issues.
But they staunchly advocate for fewer rights for men, it’s a bit surreal the cognitive dissonance that must play out there.
It would help me understand this post if you’d define “feminist.” I don’t really understand the “I’m anti-feminist but pro-equality!” mindset.
Don’t have to define it, merely observe it; it’s NOT about ‘equality.’ Otherwise, it would just be called the “equality” movement (or whatever).
As others have already pointed out, and as it’s implied in all the legit “anti-modern-feminist” pics, modern feminism is often NOT about equality or fairness, it’s about female superiority via male inferiority & persecution.
Lanie
It’s a neologism designed to divert attention away from what’s really going on, which is mark 1, mod a looting. Unearned livings. Creating problems where they don’t otherwise exist. Manufacturing victims. Manufacturing oppressors.
It’s similar to racism.
Anytime someone comes up with a special class for equality, you know absolutely your pockets are about to be picked. Otherwise, it would simply be that “all humans are equal.”
Same thing when someone calls for equality of opportunity (itself a fucktarded delusion). What they always mean is equality of results and they are always Robin Hood looking for their cut in the looting.
Follow the money.
I’m not sure how long a word takes to lose the neologism label but feminism has an 1850 date according to my 1930 Shorter Oxford Dictionary.
When I was young and when my mother was young (early 1900s) feminism was not focussed on equality but on liberation, on freedom from norms imposed on them by a dominant group. Sure we wanted equal pay for work of equal value, but we also wanted to be able to wear trousers on a bicycle and to get a mortgage in our own name (not in the name of an unemployed son, nor having them as a guarantor). We wanted to own ourselves not be dragged back to a violent husband to be raped weekly (I kid you not, that was the law in the country I was living in until the 1970s – a man had his marital rights under the law).
Sadly some time after 1980 in parallel with the anti racism movement (some aspects of this were good back then) the noisy, articulate minority became more and more socialist (radical forcible restructuring of wealth) and more and more victim oriented.
Despite the hijacking of the feminist name I still call myself a feminist but as a feminist I’m only interested in liberation, both personal and social, and that is liberation for all, men and women. I haven’t changed in that but it seems that the meaning of the term has changed.
No, it’s different with pro-minority compassionateskincolorism. The ‘system’ is so biased against people of color that we really need government to step in and force everyone to make the right decisions (works every time). You just don’t understand, you privileged white devil, you.
It’s not like a non-white person has ever been elected president.
That’s fair enough, Harriet.
I’d argue that the label hasn’t changed. It’s always been about blaming men as the oppressors, and women as the oppressed.
Karen Straughn points some of that out in this video if you care to watch:
m.youtube.com/watch?v=wA-QP1gSYJA
They also had corporal punishment for men that beat their wives, up until they outlawed it, so I’m guessing you got your history lessons from feminists, if you thought that was something that was acceptable in society. They also would humiliate men that got beaten by their wives, but you won’t hear that from a feminist, because it doesn’t fit the narrative of oppressed women, oppressive men.
Or that a woman had those kinds of marital rights too. The right to have sex with him, the right to children, the right to his money, even after a marriage ended(alimony).
So it isn’t really this portrait painted by feminism that women were oppressed, while men lived the good life. Both men and women faced oppression by the state, different in certain circumstances, but it is not what feminism has wrote about, with their half-truths, outright lies, and sometimes a part of the story, but never the whole thing.
If there is to be a predominant oppressor of women, it would have to go to institutions.
Church and state.
Individuals have very little power to oppress in terms of chronic (they can murder). It’s institutions that craft generational oppression of all, and for much of history, women got one end of a short stick and men another (like dying or being maimed in droves over just about everything, war being the most stark example). Institutionally, this was just calculus. Men pay with important risk of life and limb to have institutional domination over women.
MC
Watched that whole Karen vid and I’ve never got through more than a few minutes of any of her kitchen table stuff.
I just don’t do vids and have no idea how Molyneux gets so many views on so long vids.
Anyway, mind blown and trashed. There’s nothing like a good ignorance cure, eh?
Yeah, I find her kitchen videos a little hard to get through myself.
I do think that ignorance is the only way most people can continue to believe that feminism is about liberty or equality, or was once about liberty or equality. Some people just don’t want to believe they were lied to, and played the role of a “useful idiot” to some ideology.
I hear the same feminist arguments repeated so often, despite being proven as only half truths, or outright lies, that I feel feminism needs to really be exposed for what it is, so this “oh yeah, but I’m a good feminist, feminism was once a good movement” can be seen for what it is. The ramblings of a useful idiot.
I don’t mean the “useful idiot” label to insult, but describe the role of those people to such movements. They could genuinely think they are supporters of human rights, and freedom, pro-equality, but they only support, and give legitimacy to those groups they like to label “radical” or “fringe.”dd
“I don’t mean the “useful idiot” label to insult, but describe the role of those people to such movements. ”
Yea, but given the Internet and my own delving to truths–while loathing all the tin-foil hat types–for 20 years now, and even this excuse is wearing thin on me which is why I will be leaving the US and my goal is to die a citizen of any other country, with a charred passport.
I want to see America fail miserably, Armani suits in soup lines. I want to see China and Russia get together and devastate America economically because they so richly deserve it.
America has generations, now, living on WWII capital and cred, which was legit. It was spent in the 60s and this nation of Fucktards has been living on the dime of other countries–even 2nd world like China–to finance political power that, by definition, entails that people still get to go tot the mall every weekend.
I want no part of it and to me, it is an embarrassment to have been born American.
For some reason this post reminded me of the fucktards that made that “Dear Woman” video.
If that’s too painful to watch there’s the Will Ferrel version
Holy shit, JD. I literally could not get but 31 seconds into that. The other one is much better.
Dude, I got 47 seconds in but my balls started to retract so badly I had to stop from the pain.
I noticed that a vast majority of the responses appear to be from young women too! Great to see women who are proud to be women and who love the men in their lives!
And yes, I could not help notice they also appear to be overwhelmingly good looking gals!
I know you hate exclamation marks Richard but who gives a fuck!
you could always get Bea to post her own photo on the tumbler site and you could make that your number 1 pick…
to be honest ive always thought this way and i thought i had a bit of a problem.
i always would prefer equality for all over sage burning during the full moon.
i dont need feminism because i get claustrophobic easily and i dont like having ribbons tied into my hair.
wait- i just realised that was a big lie:
“actually that sort of ties in nicely with the “feed the animal” paleo blog ive just been reading.
the guy who writes this has a reputation for being quite sweary and manly. well, he used to be in the navy.
anyway he regularly gets into fights with women on the internet, mainly when he calls them a cunt in an argument.
well, because of this i think he’s posted something interesting today, a link to the tumblr blog “women against feminism”:
well, great, im thinking. so i made a little comment underneath which says something to the effect that ive “always thought this way”.
well, thats bullshit for a start. im convieniently forgetting my very brief and embarrasing flirtation with feminism, where i read a few too many “fat shaming” blogs one day and then decided hiccup percey was an evil rapist. ohdear.gif
i do wish i wouldnt get sucked into these things so easily.
anyway so thats my BIG LIE OF THE DAY over with. just going off now to dip herbs into my period blood and offer it up to the rainbow fairies. “
Ok, I wasn’t aware the word feminism had become associated with some kind of female supremacy. I thought it just meant equal pay, equal rights…blah blah blah. I’ve never cared much about the label, or even the cause particularly. I haven’t had to because women that came before me made my road through the world smoother – less “Mad Men” and more “Ally McBeal,” if that makes any sense. (Sorry, I don’t watch much TV anymore). Thanks for explaining. Equality for all!
It arguably did stand for those things at one point in time. Just like the civil rights movement stood for equal treatment of skin-color minorities back in the 60s.
But collectivist commie fucktards, to borrow from Richard’s lexicon, get high on guilt-tripping the world and don’t know when to quit. They hijack these movements and extrapolate the victimhood to illogical extremes. Meanwhile the media eats it up with a spoon and helps them promulgate it, victimizing many gullible people in the process, taking away their motivation to work hard and innovate, and instead turning them into lazy, worthless, entitled slobs.
The ONLY rule that stands a chance at delivering equality is one that demands it of government. ‘Separate but equal’ is a pretty clear example of an inequitable government policy. But even with a restriction on government, you will run into problems. If the USDA (gag, gag, gag, barf, gag) employs fewer blacks than are proportionally represented in the entire citizenry, does that mean the USDA’s hiring practices are racist? Or are there other possibilities? Did fewer blacks applied for available positions than non-blacks? Or if a proportionally representative or greater number applied, what if many lacked the qualifications compared to their non-black competitors? This kind of policy would be almost impossible to enforce, without indulging in the equality-of-outcomes horseshit that Richard mentioned above. Perhaps this quagmire is one argument for keeping government as small as possible.
Private persons/businesses, on the other hand, absolutely must retain the right to refuse to do business with anyone, for any reason. Otherwise, the next time I ban a female patron (or black, Muslim, etc) from my hypothetical restaurant because she is a noisy, obnoxious, intolerable customer who tries to argue her way out of paying every time, I am risking a lawsuit for ‘gender(etc)-based discrimination’. See how messy and stupid this kind of stuff can get?
You really have to be familiar with incompetent government shitheads to grasp fully why policies like this are such a bad idea. Victimizing people and turning them into spoiled, entitled fuckasses is no way to lift them out of poverty/lower status/etc. If anything, that strategy will likely make their wealth and statuses worse.
Bret:
Solemn nod. Salute. Etc.
And that video is really…REALLY painful to watch.
I’ve been seeing this general mindset — exposing the bullshit, phoniness, and hypocrisy of “modern feminism” — all across my FB posts and feeds.
Any time ignorance and bullshit is exposed, it’s a good thing.
@ Lanie:
It’s easy. If you advocate for men and women to to get equal treatment in child custody / family law cases, you’re an actual feminist.
If you think women should generally get custody, like they do now 80% or so of the time, then you’re a supremacist.
Raging against the ‘patriarchy’ even though women already get paid more than men for the same amount of hours? supremacist.
New wave feminists don’t care about equality and are all about female / minority supremacy.
Imo the woman should get custody because if I got custody I would tell the kids we are going camping, take them deep into the forest and leave them there.
Dogs are a different story though.
“Raging against the ‘patriarchy’ even though women already get paid more than men for the same amount of hours?”
This is an interesting claim. Do you have proof of it? From what I see online about figures both for my country and the US the stats don’t support that.
managed about 10 seconds.
“a growing sense of worship for the gifts of the feminine” ?
who are these robotic gimp freaks ?
Who’s in the video? Apparently it’s Gay Hendricks & Arjuna Ardagh.
theglobeandmail.com/life/the-hot-button/conscious-men-apologize-to-women-for-many-years-of-bad-behav…
I think we need to distinguish between what’s broadly known as ‘social feminism’ and ‘philosophical feminism’. Social feminism was relevant for a time because it was geared towards achieving equal rights for men and women (though personally I think equality needs to come with a few pertinent grains of salt allowing for genderal exceptions i.e. women probably should have more custodial rights than men and women probably shouldn’t be involuntarily drafted into the army during wartime).
Contrary to the vibe I’m getting in the comments it’s important to note that genderal equality actually hasn’t been achieved yet and a quick perusal of the social sciences which examines people’s attitudes to the different sexes in a clinical setting should quickly dispel that myth. Here’s one example – dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/55933/CPL_WP_05_02_HeilmanWelle.pdf
There is also the issue of women’s right outside of the ‘democratic’ world. Genital mutilation, violence against women, rape and institutionalized patriarchal dominion are still epidemic in Africa, asia and the middle east (Which is where ‘social feminists’ and women’s rights advocates should probably be focusing most of their attention now, instead of whining about their date opening the car door for them).
Philosophical feminism on the other hand is a vile, misandristic, militant school of thought which blames all the world’s problems not just on men, but on supposedly male qualities and characteristics (i.e. competition is a ‘male’ quality and is bad, cooperation is a ‘female’ quality and is good). It’s a pseudoscientific matriarchal distortion of reality which asserts that all the world’s problems could be solved if women were in charge.
I think what pisses me off the most about philosophical feminists is that they are actually anti-feminine in practice. They encourage women to embrace ‘masculine’ qualities and attitudes in order to be on equal footing with men in society and the workplace.
I find this denial of female feminism offensive to women, it implies that the only way women can be ‘equal’ to men is by becoming men, rather than embracing their innate differences.
“It’s a pseudoscientific matriarchal distortion of reality which asserts that all the world’s problems could be solved if women were in charge. ”
good point. i like this distinction. i dont know a whole lot about… anything really.. but it seems to me that there are still some serious problems on the issue of gender equality like you mention.
the whole male bashing agenda isnt helping. susan powter (low fat health guru) went down this road and thats where she lost me (well, my teeth also fell apart so there was that).
i think the insistence that if women “ran the show” that there would be no wars, no rape, no aggression and we could all dance forever around a giant tampon is ridiculous.
Agreed on all counts, Heidi. Except, if we ever did have a giant tampon, perhaps erected vertically like an obelisk, I would DEFINITELY dance around it.
it would be rude not to really.
Hmmmm
Terry Pratchett, he tell joke:
“I know it’s not the right thing to say to a lady, miss, but you are sweating like a pig!”
“My mother always said that horses sweat, men perspire, and ladies merely glow…”
“Is that so? Well, miss, you are glowing like a pig!”
Which band of feminism takes the most umbrage at this, and why?
(No answers larger than A7 will considered.)
LéonRover
(Wilde about FTA)
let the wild tampon edifice dancing commence!
“Wilde about FTA”
Oscar?
“No answers larger than A7 will considered”
You’re so narrow.