Understanding the Jamie Lee Curtis Oscar Aftermath in Clown-World-Speak
— I guarantee a deep understanding that is widely applicable to all clown-world phenomena
I have understood precisely what’s going on here for quite some time.
… Since sometime in 2018, so 5 years ago or nearly so, and my oh my has it made a difference. Searching my 5000+ post archives (and I can search the raw data for specific words or phrases, so I can’t miss) I never blogged about it until 2021. I’m not sure why, exactly, given its supreme importance in a way that everything becomes really clear and locks right into place.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FREE PDF DOWNLOAD OF THIS POST
Perhaps it was that I was going through divorce at the time, not blogging much about anything very often. Doing a lot of stupid stuff, actually, cooped up as I was in the mountains alone in a big house for two winters…
This phenomenon goes back a really long time and its most famous explicit use was in the early 1900s with the Bolshevik Revolution; how they were able to amass such a following so quickly and have that following be unabashedly loyal—up to and including a willingness to look completely crazy and stupid while putting on a smile.
Just like that photo, above…and whaddya wanna bet there were those in attendance seal-clapping to that ridiculous spectacle?
So the narrative goes something like this: After 4 decades and 80 appearances in film and TV, with some really notable performances—she’s a good actress—she gets her very first nomination and her very first win at the same time. It’s for a supporting role in a film where also, a bunch of firsts for Asians.
So the Asian thing is what it is…I never got the enthrallment over Hidden Dragon, or whatever it was that was dancing. Or something. Racism against Asians has been in the news lately so gotta get woke about that, I guess.
But why Jamie Lee Curtis…? I haven’t seen the film, so I’m just wondering if it was truly a great performance, or is something else in play? In the aftermath of getting that award…yep…sure enough. There it is, right on cue. I’ll cover that below.
Here’s the thing. Once you’ve got the technique down pat, you’ll never fail to detect it in play anywhere, from the macro down to the micro, such as in company or institutional politics.
You’ll also understand, if you’re an honest person with some pride in yourself…someone who can feel genuine shame…how you can never participate and cash in the way others do.
It’s not in you…and it’s not so much that ‘you’re better than that;’ it’s that you’re simply not that, at all. You’re fully human…
This isn’t going to be long, and one reason for that is that I’ve already got another much more comprehensive Member’s only post almost done. But when I saw this crap this morning, I laughed, and then this jumped to the head of the line.
The mention I previously gave this phenomenon, Biological Leninism (or Bioleninism for short), is here, and you really want to read this very carefully. It’s just the gist, but once you’ve got it, you’ll know it, and you’ll see it EVERYWHERE. No longer will you ever wonder, how in the hell, and, what the fuck???
It’s Always More Clowns and Jokers
You would have to do some reading and thinking to understand them, even as they do not understand themselves. Essentially, it’s their desire for the unearned—which is nothing new—but it has a modern twist that’s at the root of communist and socialist ideological antagonism since the beginning that goes beyond the basics: “what’s in it for me?” What’s in it for them is described by what’s called Bioleninism, and at base, it’s more than just the food and shelter. It’s an awarding of unearned social status.
One of the most interesting theories to come out of the Dissident Right is the theory of Biological Leninism, or Bioleninism, which describes the rise, nay, the inevitability of a coalition of the weird, inadequate, foreign and not-quite-fit-for-civilized-society as a unified voting bloc supporting those in power in a liberal democracy.
Developed by Spandrell (alias, Bloody Shovel) it takes the basic Leninist model of building a Party to rule the state out of the dregs of society, and shifts this to the realm of biology, wrong-think biology in particular, building the party out of people who are permanent losers within the social order. Naturally, this refers to the non-white, non-heterosexual, non-viable forms of life we’re forced to prostrate ourselves to as the living saints of the religion of diversity. This is for the very simple reason that those with zero status in a sane society stake their entire lives on accumulating social capital through the Party and will revert back to that position of zero status if the party ever loses power, thus ensuring their undying loyalty towards the party and undying enmity towards those who aren’t lacking in status – whether we’re talking about the ne’er do wells of old Russia or the degenerate and swarthy masses of the modern West. In other words, Bioleninism is a system through which the governing Globohomo powers ensure that those most problematic of peons – white, Christian, heterosexual men (and the women married to them) will always be outvoted (and therefore expropriated, disenfranchised and ultimately eliminated) by the aforementioned non-viable life forms.
Here’s the basic references, and they’re comprehensive, not very long. Reading these three essays gives you a degree in Bioleninism.
Now two superlative videos just barely over 50 minutes in total, and you’ve got your PhD in fully understanding everything that’s going on politically all the time, and like no one else. You will lose interest in any and all discussions with people who are ignorant of this. It would be like striking up a conversation with monkeys in the jungle.
Yes: It. Is. That. Profound.
Now, since you’ve got that education, testing time. I’ll give you another data point, stop and think about what’s going on here, and then I’ll give my take.
Did you instantly get what’s going on?
This is a complicated one. The monkey wrench is that Jamie Lee Curtis has earned status from her decades of very competent and admirable work in film and television, so she doesn’t really need to kowtow to fringe lunacy to get status. But…
- Status is relative, and she didn’t have Oscar Status…not even a nomination. Plus, she has a Golden Globe, and that just serves to increase the pressure.
- Her son is super-low status, which you can tell just by Googling a bit and looking at the poor dude.
So, what better way to get this all done than have a transvestite son demanding people call him “she,” “her,” “daughter,” “cunt” …in denial of reality.
So, Jamie gets a nomination nod, gets the Oscar—maybe it’s earned, I haven’t seen the film—but then, as if payback, and/or a show of undying loyalty…passing a test by willingly being a fucking moron on camera who’s confused about basic shit like boys and girls… Or that Oscar is a damn boy’s or man’s name…
Well, you get it, right?
But the most important part of it?
It’s understanding why and how such utter buffoons and doofuses can command such power and wealth, and why in spite of all your intelligence and talents, you just can’t ever seem to capture anything even remotely prestigious.
You’re fully human, and you have the capacity to feel embarrassment and shame.
That’s why. So, relax, sit back, understand the way the world works, and carve out your own guiltless enjoyment of your life.
WHAT IT'S ABOUT AND HOW IT WORKS
Free The Animal is an eclectic writing project about everything since November 2003. 23 years, 5,500 posts, 5 million words.
It's a paid membership blog. Most posts are free and public, but only paid members can comment. What determines whether it's free or paid is when I publish. Monday through Friday, free and public. Saturday and Sunday, for paid members. That's it. Membership info here.
Lots here for me Rich, pretty much a starter pack with those linked vids. Excellent post thank you
You’ll never say “oh, man, wish I wouldn’t have spent the 2-3 hours getting a handle on this stuff.”
She had some bad PR just a couple months ago as well…Hollywood is a giant, Satanic pedophile ring.
eviemagazine.com/post/jamie-lee-curtis-posts-picture-of-naked-child-stuffed-plastic-bin
I saw that, had forgotten about it. Can’t recall either, but seems she had some sort of explain that seemed plausible.