— A Rock-Your-Socks “Here’s What I Think”

Introduction

Understanding why this subject is of interest to me doesn’t take rocket surgery. One could say it’s near and dear to my heart. You might ask, “Why is it near and dear to your heart?” Perhaps because I see it firsthand, in person, in a fully integrated context, and not as a collection of bromides, slogans, pre-judgments, virtue signals, and excuses, which are unfortunately commonplace around the world.

For better or worse, this so-called profession is far different in Asia, and Southeast Asia in particular, than it is in the Western world. Equally unfortunate is that the global narrative on the topic is dominated by Western thought, which is rooted in Abrahamic religions. These religions view man as something that is imperfect and problematic by nature. In Christianity, it is called original sin, which is the most extreme manifestation of that idea. In Judaism, I believe it’s more thought of as a fall (I’m prepared to be corrected). Let’s just say that Islam has hundreds of years to go, from where I sit.

Whatever the case, it is an enormous contrast from how Asians, and Buddhists in particular, view the nature of men and women. So, let’s explore that contrast a little bit. But first, let’s look at the nature of man and woman in an evolutionary context, and see if we might be able to set a foundation that is honest, good, and that comes before all the layers, trappings, and moral judgments of modern-day society.

Human Evolutionary Basis

If you strip away everything and simply look at a human man and a human woman, what you see are two Homo sapiens that are agents of reproduction first and foremost. That is the only reason they exist, and their existence is an end in itself, simply species propagation to exploit an environment. There is no purpose in nature; there’s no raison d’être. It’s entirely self-serving. There’s not even any morality, which implies a choice in the matter between good and evil, or in secular parlance, between what’s good for the organism and what’s bad for the organism.

Even the oldest Western religions on Earth recognize this to some extent: man’s fall in the Garden of Eden. There was no morality prior to that fall, just one simple rule, not to be broken. That one rule was the ticket to a life of blissful ignorance. Breaking that rule ushered man into a life of the knowledge of good and evil; that is the basis of all doctrinal morality.

As we see in many animal species, most of them have males that are physically stronger than the females. This is to overcome resistance to execute the prime directive, which is sexual relations in pursuit of reproduction and propagation of the species. In the modern woke world, what is now defined as categorical rape in all cases, males are, nonetheless, on average, stronger than females. Human men are stronger than women by a rather large margin. Typically, it’s no contest.

But sex, or forcing sex, isn’t the only reason men developed strength. They also developed it because not only are women vulnerable, but they go through long periods of time where they are utterly helpless during childbearing. It’s more than a year when you consider the time after birth when the mother and her offspring need to be nurtured and fed. Women bear a real and true burden, and that is by the design of nature. Platitudes and morality don’t fucking matter when you haven’t fully and deeply integrated what sort of psyche develops out of that predicament, where on the one hand, your greatest aspiration in life is to bear one or more children, and on the other hand, you’re scared shitless because what happens if…?

Think about that? Truly think about it, men. Would you want to be in such a helpless situation, thoroughly dependent upon either some individual or some small group? You’re at their whim entirely; they can dispose of you as they wish. What can you do about it?

Sleeping With The Enemy

I observe and regard that the proto, or primitive version of what is known as the oldest profession—prostitution, or derisively, “whoring around”—has roots in an actual evolutionary adaptation of human females. Humans are social animals; they form tribes, and every tribe is a potential danger and threat to every other tribe. Take the apparatus of masculinity and strength that nature designed to brave the elements, protect offspring, and to seek and create more offspring, and then scale that up to the tribe level, and further up to dominion—it equals conflict, war, murder, rape, and pillage. That is a core historical reality when looking at human pre-civilization and civilization.

What’s a chick to do for her own survival, being as she is weaker and often utterly helpless? She needs to develop and maintain the skills, appearance, and demeanor that make her valuable—a prize, a spoil, a conquest—as well as something to be loved, cherished, protected, and provided for. To be blunt about it, she needs to know how, if necessary, to immediately shift alliances and sleep with the enemy, or the former enemy. When you think about it honestly like that, there’s nothing more natural in the world. It is pure survival calculation, and to that extent, it’s hardwired into women.

This means that those abilities, those instincts, can be used in other areas—and as all men know, they will be used in other areas. If you’re honest about that and confront that reality, you can not only make use of it, but you can benefit from it, and you can do so without being in any way manipulative yourself. It’s simply a matter of understanding who they are, why they are that way, how to work with that, how to make them happy, how to provide them with what they want—which is concrete…safety and security…or at least the belief that you’re capable and willing to provide that.

And if you are, you can call it loyalty, but you better keep doing it if you want to maintain that loyalty, and you better be good at it, or you will be disappointed. Disappointment can manifest in different ways—her leaving you is the best and easiest of those ways. The worst is that she becomes a nagging, fat, unattractive cunt who shames and guilts you all day long, incessantly.

That’s the trap you never want to find yourself in, whether you hold up your end of the bargain, or not. You can leave, too.

The “Gatekeepers of Sex” Euphemism

Now let’s examine a left-hand, right-hand inconsistency—or a bare-ass contradiction—in our modern world. On the one hand, you have derision for women who engage in the oldest profession. On the other hand, you have the lofty ideal and identification—spread by feminists and even red-pillers alike—that women are “the gatekeepers of sex.”

Well, how does that square?

If by seeking some form of compensation for sexual services, it’s called one thing, but by leaving that gate locked until she exclusively decides to open it, on what basis does she open it? Does she open it because he’s a broke-dick, sweet-talking romantic (AKA, a liar) with nothing more to offer her? Or does she open it because not only does he offer the chocolates, roses, dinner, and a movie, but there are signs that he’s willing and able to offer a whole hell of a lot more than that?

So, I ask you, how does it really square, honestly? To deride a woman who, out of her own survival pressures, without much to offer but what nature has provided her in the context of sexual dynamics, decides to support herself and others that she may have the responsibility of supporting because some guy, who made all the promises, didn’t fulfill them… And for 50 or 100 bucks, she performs some sexual services…

Contrast this with the woman of “high virtue,” who only opens the gate when she’s assured that the man pledges his whole life…well-being, financial wherewithal, accumulated and future assets, and his very essential happiness…to her.

Men, how much sense does that make to you? And women, what sort of con are you trying to pull here?

At least be honest.

Cui Bono?

Whenever confronted by the sorts of stark contradictions—when you look at them carefully and honestly—and they are so pervasive in all of society, in all of culture, in all paradigms, in all narratives—and when you do that and you go, “Huh?” What you do then is you look to see who is benefiting. We can make some guesses.

Let’s begin with women themselves. By practicing this virtue, when it’s easy to do so because society is so structured (one could even go back and say, “Is society structured in that way because of that?” or at least in part?) how much is civilization…political, social, and cultural structure a result of this very fundamental “sleeping with the enemy” dynamic? Is it all just a grand scheme to tame the proclivities of men, or at least relegate them to the hush-hush closet?

Because it is without a doubt that it is only men who, on average, throughout their lives, produce excess value than what they need for themselves alone. Women, on average, are net consumers of value. It is only because men over-produce to such an extent that women survive at all and prosper to levels greater than their wildest dreams. This is factual, and it’s because of nature, and it’s because women are not only just weaker but typically go through long periods of helplessness.

… I’m not ragging on women for not being net producers of value, and I’m talking about financial values here—GDP-type stuff. I’m not denigrating their contribution by being the ones who bear and raise the next generation of men who lift all boats. I’m not making that value distinction whatsoever. Men and women are of equal importance to the furtherment of the human species—obviously.

So I’m just talking about the nuts and bolts, concrete, steel, glass, and kitchen appliances that it takes to survive and prosper. So women, as a whole and as a general rule, benefit from this societal structure. But who else does? Well, the power elites do. Do you think particularly men in those circles have any difficulties with access to any and all sexual services that they may desire? Are you listening, Jeffrey Epstein?

And on that score, you’ve never really seen or heard me talk much or at all about that whole Epstein affair. Knowing what I know, and seeing what I’ve seen, and from my experience, there isn’t one little thing that’s surprising about any of that. On the one hand, to me, what’s surprising (not really, though) is all the virtue-signaling surrounding it…all the surprise, and the “I am so shocked” bullshit—mostly from a bunch of people who are likely hiding their envy, jealousy, and fantasy. “If only….”

Meaningless Cunty Distinctions By The Unfuckables

I could perhaps be persuaded, or at least willing to be persuaded, that all of this societal sexual machinery that I’ve been talking about is good, right, and valid. In spite of the shortcomings, in the end, it produces great results. That would have been the case during the time when Calvin Klein billboards and magazine advertisements were worth looking at and didn’t induce gut-wrenching vomit, or when the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition was the most anticipated magazine issue on the globe. But we don’t live in those times anymore, do we? Why don’t we? It’s because of the nature of the antagonistic left and who they are fundamentally. Fundamentally, they are a bunch of lazy, dishonest parasites. They spend their entire lives struggling to live at someone else’s expense, and by that, I mean they seek to fake that they are producing meaningful and measurable concrete values that others seek to compensate them for.

So instead, they engage in busywork to produce a bunch of meaningless, irrelevant, worthless crap and partake in the circle jerk of promoting each other’s crap, patting each other on the back, and giving each other awards, merits, medals, certificates, honors, and prizes. The bargain is this: you get to be a lazy, parasitical, dishonest dumbass all your fucking miserable life, but so long as you are loyal to us, we will bestow upon you all manner of status that you do not deserve.

The left always resorts to ad hominem name-calling, principally “You’re racist,” “You’re a supremacist,” “You’re a misogynist,” “You’re this,” and “You’re that.” They do this because they have no good arguments. If they had good arguments, I assure you that they would use them. The other manifestation is that they must always double down because to not double down is tantamount to admitting defeat. So, it comes in stages: first, you have the name-calling and ad hominem because there are no good arguments. As that begins to collapse, you have the doubling down, and doubling down, and doubling down, which we have seen since 2015, beginning with Brexit, continuing on with Trump and COVID, forced medical experimentation, ridiculous green energy, and net-zero laughable bullshit. And it’s still collapsing; it’s still being exposed on a daily basis.

The elephant in the room keeps getting bigger and bigger. So, what is the final manifestation? We’re seeing it now. Eventually, you get to the point where you must destroy that which you claim to protect. Do phrases like “It’s a threat to our democracy” and “We must protect our democracy” ring a bell? In the latest and greatest of current events are the efforts by a small handful of states to remove former President Donald Trump from the ballot. I forget, is voting in a voting booth by private ballot or secret ballot something like a core tenet of democracy? That the people get to choose who they wish to represent or rule them—take your pick. So, to preserve that, we find ourselves in the contradictory position that we must eliminate one of those choices before people have a chance to choose it. If that doesn’t expose what they’re worried about, I don’t know what does.

But on this specific topic here, when you look at this all deeply, fundamentally, and honestly, and connect the dots and synthesize, you see that all these different things are really all the same: laziness and dishonesty, a desire to live at the expense of others, and have status while doing so. Think about women who are the first to deride and make meaningless distinctions about other women for reasons of their own, deciding to use what God gave them while they still can, and either earn or supplement a living. Contrast that with so-called women who get fatter and fatter, more unattractive, more unfuckable, more peevish, more cunty, more disagreeable, more awful on every imaginable layer and level, and one day they find themselves in a situation they don’t wish to admit to themselves: nobody wants to fuck them.

Now think about that, strip it all away, go back to the dynamics of the male and female that we talked about at the very beginning. What is the one single viable reality that every reasonably attractive woman can count on? That very nearly every adult male of any age in their view wants to fuck them. They know this; they have no doubt about it. That fact of reality largely forms their whole psyche throughout their lives. Mothers teach it to their daughters. Used wisely, judiciously, and fairly, an elegant, feminine, alluring, mysterious, exotic use of this innate ability can serve a good woman throughout her life, and she will be cherished. But sadly, the cunts will have nothing of it because they’re lazy and fat and disgusting and seek unearned status on that basis, and it’s laughably ridiculous, and it will not stand.

It’s not just that men aren’t amused; men aren’t aroused. And if men aren’t aroused, that is a prelude to the collapse of civilization. So just keep at it, you cunts. See what happens.

Observations From The Land of Smiles

Brevity is king. I’m streamlining these HWIT issues down to the marrow, usually, and this one’s fatty already. The juicy details will have to wait. It’s marinating.

Now, let’s shatter some glass. Imagine a Pattaya GoGo dancer who isn’t just gyrating for baht—a wizard in finance, a titan in trucking with her old man, a navigator in a sea of cardinal points. Picture that. A woman who can probably school you in the monsoon patterns while you’re stuck recalibrating your moral compass.

Surprise, gentlemen. This lady’s bucking the stereotype with a sledgehammer. And I’m not just her patron—I’m her chronicler.

This story? It’s got a velvet rope around it. Thailand Confidential, exclusive to the inner circle. Want in? Membership’s calling, and the clock’s ticking down to a New York minute. Two days. Tick-tock.